I’m not defending attacking a school in any sense, but I also don’t trust Iranian media.

Do we have third party evidence that this happened? Most articles are just quoting Iranian sources.

Huh? No one is angry about that. It is state media. But it’s independent even if the Tories did try and make it less so.

The issue is that most people associate “state media” with it being controlled by the state.

We are absolutely not defending the US. Think about it. Why would the world’s largest military need the UK to defend them?

The UK is stopping Iran firing missiles are countries that aren’t involved.

What am I missing here? The UK is just saying to Iran don’t fire missiles at countries that haven’t been involved in firing missiles at you.

That’s sensible.

To be fair I hadn’t heard of some of these, so I think you’re right. I wouldn’t go so far as as to say he’s a white supremacist but it definitely seems like he has an “ideology”

Edit: The more I read about it the more it’s pissing me off. Especially defending DHH who wrote that trash article about London (I’m not a Londoner but I’m a Brit who’s there enough with work to know he’s talking absolute shit).

I don’t think you should be able to make claims like this without hard proof.

Do you have any information about this?

Edit: So I found out where you read that, and that article is wayyy over thinking that comment.

I think the Twitter comment could be taken multiple ways and it would be fair to give them the benefit of the doubt.

Surely you read the article?

"The requirement from the start was byte-for-byte identical output from both pipelines. "

The bytecode from C++ is identical to the Rust output.