You don’t need to study law to be able to tell that somebody did something heinous or not.
A lot of heinous things aren’t necessarily against the law. For example, there’s an email in the file from a law professor advising him on legally trafficking minors to states with lower ages of consent.
Non-lawyers have zero capacity to do that, though. There’s a big difference between what any one person wants the law to be and what it actually is.
True, true. Child fucking is tricky legal territory.
I’m sure we can find few lawyers outside of DOJ.
Besides, lawyers exist because courts have strict requirements regarding interpretation of a law in order to sentence someone.
You don’t need to study law to be able to tell that somebody did something heinous or not.
A lot of heinous things aren’t necessarily against the law. For example, there’s an email in the file from a law professor advising him on legally trafficking minors to states with lower ages of consent.
Cool. Don’t care. In the wood chipper. As with anyone in the files. We can sift through the ashes afterwards to determine guilt.