• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It depends on the states. I won’t be surprised if some states cancel their elections because the incumbents don’t want to risk the results not being what they want.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      okay, so we have a bunch of blue states holding elections and a bunch of red states not. what is the outcome of that? not good for red states. so the red states have to hold elections if the blue states do. and california is holding elections.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There are ambitious MAGAs in those states, too, who won’t be happy about not getting their chance to enjoy the corruption. What about down ballot offices that have term limits, and the holder has to leave? There are people retiring, and need to be replaced.

      We can’t just cancel elections for Congressional races. There are too many other important state and local races.

    • TwilitSky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Then they’ll create the 100% probability that none of their votes or incumbents will be considered.