• acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        It gives us a “nuclear button” where we can threaten with massive sell-offs that could tank the value of US bonds. To counter it they would have to basically raise interest rates and/or print money. Sure it would hurt us too, but not before hurting them more. Now if you also place this in a context of coordination with other debt owners (Europeans, Chinese), we can really hurt them.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          First question is, massive sell off to whom? Second, it’s obviously going to have a have a huge impact on our own economy. It’s not going to hurt them more because the US is a much bigger economy than us. Can you show me a historical instance of this sort of threat actually working in practice?

          If this gave any actual leverage then China would be keeping their bonds instead of doing a fire sale right now. The only countries buying up US bonds are the ones that are under the US thumb right now.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            20 days ago

            First question is, massive sell off to whom?

            Any bonds that are at their due date are required to be paid out by the US treasury.

            Most holders of US bonds have a revolving collection of them, so some are coming due on a regular and continual basis.

            Admittedly, that’s not a mass sell-off, but it still puts pressure on the US if everyone starts doing it .

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              20 days ago

              Sure, if everybody started dumping US assets in a coordinated fashion that would hurt the US, we both know is not going to happen though. So, in reality Canada is simply making itself more dependent on the US. There’s no need to do mental gymnastics to pretend that this is some 4D chess.

              • acargitz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 days ago

                I don’t pretend to know anything about international finance. I’m repeating what I’ve heard.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  It’s also worth thinking about what you hear as well. People say all kinds of things, and a lot of time it’s just nonsense. As I pointed out, if holding US debt gave any actual leverage, then China would be doing that instead of selling it off now.

              • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                in reality Canada is simply making itself more dependent on the US.

                And doing so in a relatively carefully manner so as not to hurt ourselves unnecessarily.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Making ourselves more dependent on a hostile power is precisely what’s hurting us unnecessarily. Incredible that people can’t seem to understand this.

                  • Jhex@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    19 days ago

                    So what’s your point here?

                    IIT you are both arguing it’s bad Canada held onto these investments while saying Canada cannot actually dump them without hurting itself

    • AGM@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      You may be misunderstanding the data. This isn’t government holdings of treasuries. It’s public and private holdings, so it includes both the BoC holdings and the holdings of private investors. The government’s holdings at the BoC stayed pretty much the same over the year. The increase basically all comes from private investors, and the government can’t choose to sell their treasuries.