• phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    What’s the play here? Something isn’t making sense.

    With the Trump administration, the only thing you can be sure of is that the stated reason isn’t the real reason. Somebody’s got to be getting a payday from this.

    • Bieren@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a money grab. About the only networking companies that build in the us are like Cisco and juniper. Which odds are, you aren’t running at home. This is without a doubt a money grab. Google and Amazon will gladly pay the exemption fee. Some others will as well. This isn’t about security or “pay American”. It’s a money grab.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same play as always. Bullies countries and corps to get what he wants. As long as it serves him that’s all he cares about.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      There will be some meetings with oems, and gold things dropped on his desk, and the exceptions will start being handed out. Same as always.

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, you can run your own router on your own hardware but other than that, agreed.

        • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          My point was mostly that the concept of a router can be executed by any computer with more than one NIC.

          Trump isn’t allowing computers from outside the US. Only routers.

          • Reygle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yeah, I wonder how the dumbasses licking his boots will feel about brands like Qotom/etc making high interface mini pcs- whether they consider them “routers” under this. I hope we don’t have to go back to what I did 10 years ago- cheap intel desktops with 3-4 nics.

    • excral@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      New business venture: sell computers that totally aren’t routers, pinky promise, but just randomly happen to run OpenWrt perfectly and have all the needed hardware.

  • Antaeus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Cisco is made in China. Ubiquiti, Vietnam or Thailand I think.

    How is this going to work?

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      If we see a reversal of the policy soon then it was a standard playbook policy announcement to receive corrupt bribery money from some big manufacturers and importers. If we don’t, it may very well have been with no takers anyway.

      We’ve seen it plenty before (within the last year). Like tarrifs, then exclusions, etc.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Smuggling? Setting up a factory in Florida that reboxes routers and slaps “Made In America” stickers on them? Resale/referb router prices going through the roof?

      Take your pick.

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    lmfao. apparently the way this was originally written would have prevented non-exempt routers from getting security updates. you know, the alleged reason this ruling even exists. somebody at the FCC office of engineering and technology must have noticed because they issued a temporary waiver (PDF file).

    Applying the revised 47 CFR §§ 2.932(b) and 2.1043(b) to the newly added Covered Routers would have the effect of prohibiting permissive changes to Covered Routers even if they were authorized prior to the March 23, 2026, Covered List addition. This prohibition would be in effect even for Class I permissive changes—such as software and firmware security updates that mitigate harm to U.S. consumers—because previously-authorized Routers are now covered equipment. … Therefore, OET concludes that a limited waiver until March 1, 2027, is warranted and in the public interest. March 1, 2027, is convenient because it is the date until which the recent DoW determination excepts certain otherwise Covered Routers. Prior to March 1, 2027, the OET will re-evaluate whether to further extend applicability.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      On Linux you can just turn the kernel into a router with a few commands. Its actually very cool.

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      For anyone looking into this, I recommend picking up a “network appliance” PC. They’re low-spec, often fanless, and come with 4 Ethernet ports. You can often get them for roughly the same price as a router. You will need to provide your own WiFi AP with this method.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hmmm… so if you install a router os on a pc that’s made outside the US, will that make you a criminal?

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    All the thrift stores here throw them away. I’ve got dozens of them, variety of all types piled up in the closet because why the fuck the not? Fucking knew they’d come after them eventually.

  • nao@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    From another article about this topic:

    This leads to the question of what exactly the FCC means by consumer-grade routers.

    In September 2024, NIST submitted proposals to strengthen the – undeniably modest – IT security of routers (NIST IR 8425A). It states: “Routers forward data packets, most commonly Internet Protocol (IP) packets, between networked systems.”

    This encompasses a wide range of devices, from WLAN repeaters to smartphones

    So new smartphones are banned too?

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They wouldn’t be forwarding packets between networked systems unless you’re using one as a hotspot. And even then I don’t know if the term “networked systems” would include a single computer or if they intend it to mean an area network of some kind.

  • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    2 days ago

    The rent for your ISP provided hardware is about to go up by x10. Also you will get a letter saying you don’t have an approved router installed.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just to spell out what many comments already hint at:

    There are no US-made routers. “Made” here refers to companies, not where the stuff is actually made. Even if the plastic housing happened to be made in the US for one or two products, the components are still from far away.

    Those few US companies paid MAGA for this.

    This is corruption pure and simple.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      2 days ago

      And also I’m SURE there will be no backdoors installed in these routers. This was a mutual deal to control information, not just a financial one

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s okay when it’s OUR backdoor, it’s not okay when it’s their speculative backdoor.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Those few US companies paid MAGA for this.

      Almost certainly not just a money thing. They very likely also made deals for government access to and control of their devices. This isn’t just corruption. It is fascism.

    • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I upgraded mine last year. Went from a core 2 duo with 4gig of ram to a fifth generation I5 with 16 gig of ram. Installed pfblockerNG and now I don’t need any other device to have a decent filter.

  • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    2 days ago

    So consumer grade routers are a security risk, but not ISP switches or server routers? That’s the opposite of what a state level actor would look for.

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, it’s kind of old news that these consumer routers make up the majority of bot nets, although I doubt requiring them to be US-made will change much.

      • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        As I read it, they are scared of the Chinese Communist Party having an “official” back door built in. Not run-of-the-mill criminal bot-nets.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think you guy are forgetting Occam Razor… the most likely scenario (least assumptions) here is that some inept appointee from the orange pedo thought this would be a good idea and pushed it with the research, planning and preparation we all put at farting after eating Taco Bell

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s a line about “… unless they have a waiver.”

      That’s the razor, it’s gatekeeping for who can get your special permit.

    • IratePirate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      So at what point do they ban all new computers not made domestically?

      FTFY. It’s the same thing.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      well pricing them out of reach of the population wasn’t working, so soon