• Google is making it mandatory to have Play Services for its next-generation reCAPTCHA system on Android.

  • Your phone will need to be running Play Services version 25.41.30 or greater when the system asks you to scan a QR code for verification.

  • This hurdle means that de-Googled phones will fail the verification test by default.

  • luciferofastora@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    What if someone has an iPhone?

    Per https://support.google.com/recaptcha/answer/16609652

    Supported Environments for reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification:

    • Android Devices:

      • Google Play Services version 25.41.30 or greater.
      • To verify Google Play Services version on an Android device, open Settings > Apps > All Apps > Google Play Services
    • iOS/iPadOS devices for QR Code Scan:

      • Version 15.0 or greater.
    • iOS/iPadOS devices for “Click to Verify” Button:

      • Version 16.4 or greater.
      • Version 15.0-16.4 with the reCAPTCHA app installed.

    What if I am browsing on my phone?

    I’m not seeing anything related to that specifically, but I imagine a (supported) mobile browser will be able to interface with Play Services directly and not need a QR code challenge.

    If you use an unsupported browser, I think we can both guess what’s gonna happen. As for what browsers are supported:

    https://support.google.com/recaptcha/answer/6223828?hl=en&ref_topic=6188330&sjid=5375685544242031989-EU

    Browser requirements for reCAPTCHA

    We support the two most recent major versions of the following:

    • desktop (Windows, Linux, Mac) - Chrome - Firefox - Safari - Chromium Edge
    • mobile
      • Chrome
      • Safari
      • Android native browser

    Guess if you’re using Firefox mobile, you’re fucked - plz switch to Chrome, thank you and welcome to our digital prison saferoom!

    What if I don’t have my phone near me?

    You mean you don’t carry our surveillance device with you 23/7 (we’ll give you an hour for sleep)?

    I’m somehow reminded of that mobile Diablo announcement and the surprised response “Don’t you guys have phones?”

    This sounds like some optional, extreme case feature. Like when they are pretty much sure you’re a bot but the website optionally gives you last one chance to prove you’re not instead of just rejecting your request.

    The stated goal is to fight fraudulent agentic AI: “As we identify potentially fraudulent behavior from agents, we enable application providers to deter and mitigate malicious requests by requesting humans to be in the loop using the new QR code-based challenge.”

    https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/introducing-google-cloud-fraud-defense-the-next-evolution-of-recaptcha/

    So they’d do this when they suspect the thing interacting with the page is not a human, but expects a human to be involved with the process. How exactly that “potentially fraudulent behavior” would be detected is a different question and I have absolutely zero faith that it will fulfill its mission dutifully and without collateral damage. But then, if you’re compliant with their requirements, that collateral damage is negligible. They made sure that the prison saferoom is really comfy.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Thanks for checking. That clarifies things a lot.

      I guess we’re fucked. reCaptcha is not used for visiting websites but for registering or submitting form. I can think of couple of cases where I’m required to complete captcha for online shopping or, ever worse, for work. Step by step they will force us all to either use approved devices or be locked out of big parts of the internet.

      This is of course thanks to all the people shitting on Firefox over the years and saying that Chrome is just better and that there’s nothing wrong with giving Google control over the web. So yeah, thanks.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        This is of course thanks to all the people shitting on Firefox over the years and saying that Chrome is just better and that there’s nothing wrong with giving Google control over the web. So yeah, thanks.

        No it’s not thanks to those people. Blaming individuals for not stopping what a much bigger, infinitely more resourced, organized actor has been/is doing to maximize profit is shifting the material responsibiltiy from the actor with real power to the actors without. It’s like the personal carbon footprint oil&gas came up with to shift responsibility for climate pollution from themselves to individuals. Or plastic and recycling. It feels good to lay blame on those people who did something we did not but it doesn’t help change anything material beyond that. Divides us into camps which prevents us from organizing against the profit-driven culprits.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          No, it’s absolutely not like oil & gas. Average person has very little impact on the energy policy of their country but has huge impact on the browser they are using. And I’m not talking about the ignorant people using the default browser without understanding the difference between Chrome and Google. I’m talking about all the technically literate people that should known better but chose to use Chrome because it’s slightly more convenient. The people that attack Mozilla for not being able to compete with Google with fraction of their resources. When the only way to browse the web is with Google account I will definitely remember those people.

          • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            The technically lirerate people aren’t exempt from the power dynamics created by the vast market share of Chrome and Google, created and reinforced by Google. Even if they/we have some more freedom to maneuver. We still only test our web app features on Chromium because there’s limited time for testing, if any, and we can’t convince product that making sure the feature works, or fixing bugs on a 2-3% browser is priority. If all the developers in the world used Firefox, it would still not change this power dynamic.

            • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              if any, and we can’t convince product that making sure the feature works, or fixing bugs on a 2-3% browser is priority.

              That’s exactly the problem. If all the people that should know better promoted Firefox in stead of shitting on Mozilla it would not be 2-3% browser. Linux is hitting 5% market share and it’s way more complicated to switch OS than a browser. It doesn’t make sense that even less people user Firefox. Of course it’s just my opinion but I believe that consistent effort from the community to warn people about Chrome and promote Firefox would help it keep sufficient market share to stay relevant. Instead, even here on lemmy, people love to complain about Mozilla and promote other browsers. So yeah, great job everyone.

          • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I am shocked constantly by the number to tech-savvy people in my circle that still use chrome… Like, they complain that ublock origin “died” and I can’t help but stare slack-jawed at them…

      • luciferofastora@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I had unsolvable captcha for Github once. Fuck ne, I guess. I just wanted to contribute something, but whatever.

        Step by step they will force us all to either use approved devices or be locked out of big parts of the internet.

        there’s nothing wrong with giving Google control over the web

        To quote a song about a “Fairytale of Doom”:

        Blinded by gold and blinded by diamonds
        I let you chain me in silk
        You told me lies, I drowned in your eyes
        And in all those castles you built

        Silver the treasure and gold in the cages
        Nothing was quite as it seemed
        And when I realized, you turned the key and
        I saw your eyes full of greed
        It was too late when I screamed

        I try to stay optimistic that this won’t be tenable. Giving in to despair makes it harder to muster the will to resist. But I won’t deny it’s getting tougher.

    • BranBucket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Zugzwang strategy. You have to make move, there’s not even an option not to play.

      It’s not just about capturing the mobile phone market and punishing alternate ROM developers, it’s also pushing people into the market that might otherwise choose to have a dumb phone, no phone, do things in person, via mail, etc. No android/iPhone? Good luck with online shopping, communicating with medical providers, checking your kid’s grades online, paying utility bills, taxes, etc. etc.

      As the boomers die off, and fewer people do things the pre-internet way, there’s no incentive for governments, businesses, and so forth to maintain those processes and systems. Why would we have a receptionist take appointments by phone if she’s just typing them into the same web interface? Why print report cards when we can post them online? Why maintain a storefront and not just warehouses like Amazon?

      Opt-in to surveillance or opt out of necessary parts of life, all under the guise of “convenience”.