For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

            • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              63
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Those sites will be dead to me :)

              QR codes are like the popups of days gone by. With incredibly few exceptions, I refuse to scan them. They are so easy to redirect for nefarious purposes, and you can’t easily inspect the url to know, assuming thats something you even do. Also my phone case covers the camera and it’s a bitch to get open so I’m very choosy with what gets camera time.

              • Ghoelian@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                21
                ·
                7 days ago

                On my phone I use URLCheck (available in f-droid). You set it as your default browser app, but instead of opening a browser, it opens a popup where you can see the URL, and use some useful tools like removing tracking parameters or automatically rewriting x.com to xcancel.com. The rewritten URL can then just be forwarded to your actual browser (or whatever app is set up to handle that particular URL).

                I still won’t actually open random qr code URLs though, especially not ones from google.

                • Taldan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  How do the rewrites work? Is it like Redirector?

                  Would be awesome if I could just import my Redirector regex json file

                • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  After doing that, do you have an option to select which application you want to run (browser, video player etc?)

                  I use Open Link With, but would love to be able to edit the URL before.

                  Edit: From the description I think it might do that. This is neat, thanks for the recommendation.

              • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 days ago

                …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                Unfortunately, we’re fighting an uphill battle here.

                We’d need government regulation “protecting privacy”, instead they seem all too eager to concede that in a futile effort to " protect the children ".

                • Axolotl@feddit.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  I doubt SearXNG is going to integrate it lmao, and if they do, someone will fork or i will keep using older versions

                • Phantaloons@piefed.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                  Searching is already dead. Every search results in 200 Ai articles full of bullshit, even Qwant or DuckDuckGo.

                  The corpo-web died already, y’all are just crying over the scraps.

                • nyan@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                  At which point they cease to be your favourites, I hope. There are so many alternatives in that space that only inertia keeps people using the Empire of Evil.

            • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              WTF? I don’t think I will use any sure that will enable this?

              How does that prevent bots? Ther are massive phone farms, that can’t scan QR?

              This only exists so they can link identity of your phone with your desktop computer.

      • Seldon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        7 days ago

        For people who want an opinionated browser… Yes. They have sponsored shortcuts which cannot be disabled and they ghost out the option to in the settings. If you want to dig around the about:config and tweak things, fine, but I’d rather use a browser I can make my own. Librewolf is excellently bare bones.

        • NakedNateRollerSkate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          I haven’t seen any of those things yet, but I’ll try to keep an eye out. The only one I noticed was a default search engine to Google, but DDG was an easy enough option. I like libre wolf as well, but I’m not a fan of the updating scheme on my system.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          Sponsored shortcuts? They don’t have them, i did a clean install only some week ago so i doubt it’s a new thing

        • M137@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Never seen those, and did a fresh install recently too. And zen has a lot of customization options, it’s also so damn well designed and is great to use.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      FF support is getting worse and worse though.

      Barely any of the sites I use for work support FF.

      Laugh all you want but shit is a bit fucked.

      Ladybird is our last best hope and its barely a glimmer.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        7 days ago

        Fun fact: many sites that say that they don’t support firefox lie, their sites usually support it but they never tested it or they deem firefox “less secure” or some bullshit, but with an useragent spoofer, they will work

        (Not all sites ofc)

            • fizzle@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I’m not talking about sites that claim not to support FF. I’m talking about sites that have broken features when visited in FF.

              • Axolotl@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Do you have any example? Can you send any link? I never experienced those problems myself so i want to try

                • [deleted]@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  Chrome is doing the same thing as Internet Explorer did by not following web standards. There are several websites I have used where the payment process or uploading process only worked in chrome.

                  Again, this is a problem with chrome doing things that breaks consistency between browsers that are supposed to be following the same web standards.

                • fizzle@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  This is very well documented, and a very common experience.

                  They were talking about exactly this on late night linux podcast just last week.

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        That isn’t FF support. That is chrome doing the same thing as Internet Explorer did by implementing non-standard functionality to abuse their market dominance.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Sure but if devs don’t test sites in Firefox then very they don’t support Firefox.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      The MV3 support in firefox is even stricter than in Chrome. I found that chrome will let you sidestep CSP to make an HTTP request. Firefox won’t.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t understand what you found, but firefox still supports the web request blocking API for Mv3 extensions, which is what ublock needs.

        • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I was debugging one of my favourite extensions this week to figure out why it didn’t work on firefox. It hadn’t been updated in years, so something changed in firefox in the last few months.

          I assume the Chrome version still works. I’m not installing it.

    • henfredemars@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      198
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yep, sorry but not sorry. Advertisements aren’t safe. The industry has been ruined by bad actors and it’s a shame, but also not my problem.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        136
        ·
        7 days ago

        I worked in ads only a few months and learned how fucked that industry was. They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser, sucking as much info as they can. The fact that it hasn’t been regulated to hell is shocking, and truly a failure of all leaders.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          75
          ·
          7 days ago

          They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser

          That’s the crazy thing.

          You want to show me an image, maybe an animated gif, and link it to your website where you’re selling shit? Fine. Annoying, but fine.

          But I don’t care how many crocodile tears they shed about ‘but websites depend on ad income’ – I am not letting random, unvetted advertisers run arbitrary code on my computer. I don’t care if it’s in a sandbox inside a sandbox. Exploits may be found, sandboxes may be escaped. And there’s plenty of trouble they can get into even within their little sandbox, like running a fucking crypto miner or something.

          So, yeah. Adblock and noscript everywhere and always.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yes, they can host a GIF on their server & show it to me with a non-personalized link, & promote it where they believe the average reader might be interested in it. Or some reader(s).

            Just show me the ads you’re showing everybody else, and make money from sales of useful things & services.

            • OwOarchist@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              7 days ago

              It’s not even that hard to have targeted ads while still respecting privacy – just base the targeting on the other content on the page, rather than on the user.

        • Airfried@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Internet Browsers store way too much data and have waaaay too many permissions. It’s sickening.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            not enough, what they want is personal data to mine. they cant do that in simple terms. meta, glassdoor, indeed , linkden,(plaid) tries to use convoluted mehtods to get you to give up more personal data than you normally would in order to access the rest of the site.(glassdoor and indeed has an additional reason to want you ridentiy)

        • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s because people don’t go into these offices with fire and guns. If a bunch of advertising people were slaughtered every few weeks things may get better.

          Same goes for collections, eventually no one will want to do the job.

      • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        The whole industry is bad actors. The quaint, pastoral idea of actually advertising things you genuinely might want to know about is utterly beyond dead, it died the moment they realized they could use the same pipeline to harvest data and manipulate and control people. Using it for mere advertising is a waste of everyone’s time and resources when they have an option so much more lucrative on the table.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Over 10 years ago someone at my office had their work PC and user drive encrypted with ransomware because of a bad ad injection from one of those job search sites. Thankfully it was limited to nothing critical and incremental backups restore the drive…but hopefully they found a good lead because they were canned.

      If they’d had a good ad blocker this would have been a non issue

      • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        7 days ago

        I work in IT: Pretty much all the malware we deal with comes from ads. I’ve pitched making ad blocking standard but they never go for it, even though it’s clear it would prevent an absolute shit ton of attacks. It’s crazy!

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      Seriously. If Google really wants to shove ads down our throats, they could at least regulate them so they’re not constantly horny scams. But that would cost them money, oh the humanity.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    185
    ·
    7 days ago

    Oh look all the “chrome but in a different outfit” browsers are doing the same terrible shit? What a shocker, no one could have predicted that the many many things all on the same base where actuality just fake competition.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      7 days ago

      They are all chrome with google scratched out and their name written in sharpie in its place.

      Of course they are all doing it, cause they are all the same thing.

    • andz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It’s a damn shame, I’ve always liked Vivaldi otherwise. I’ve been dual running Vivaldi and Firefox for years now, Vivaldi for casual browsing and Firefox for more serious stuff + YouTube.

      Oh well, it’s time to do a full switch, I guess.

      Kinda funny, I’ve been doing the exact same thing with Win/Linux for approximately the same length of time. Needed Win because of dome software that just doesn’t work linux, and sadly, I still do.

      Google and Microsoft can go fuck each other with a frozen cactus for all I care.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 days ago

        The folks at Vivaldi have been doing some work on their internal ad blocker, I think with the intention to bring most of the functionality of uBo internally so that it doesn’t have to be an extension. Not sure how far along they are, but maybe they’re intentionally keeping it quiet.

    • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I mean, on a technical level chromium isn’t a terrible browser engine. Building your own engine from scratch is Extremely Hard™ and it’s entirely possible to build a decent browser on top of it, so I can understand why most alternative projects have done just that.

      It’s just… google’s control over chromium is concerning.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 days ago

      God it still pisses me off what they did to my boy Opera. All of us left when they diverted after v12. We all saw this coming.

      Then Vivaldi came which I have tried in quite a while but it sucked. Firefox it is.

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Firefox and its derivatives (and Safari - sorry Apple users) are the only browsers not using Google’s Blink web engine these days - at least until Ladybird is released.

    Despite the Mozilla Foundation’s many stupid decisions, Firefox (and Safari) is starting to look like the only thing stopping Google from completely controlling the internet.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    6 days ago

    The browser wars have been kind of strange from the perspective of someone who’s been using Firefox for well over a decade. It’s a bit like hearing about the Civil War while living in Oregon.

  • DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    7 days ago

    Remember that article awhile back about the FBI recommending you use an adblocker?

    That means even the FBI recommends you don’t use Google and Microsoft browsers anymore

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      7 days ago

      They could have sat on 30 second ads every 15 minutes till the cows came home and most of us would have been fine with it.

      They could have sat on premium family for $9 a month for years and we’d have been ok with it.

      They had to be greedy as fuck until none of us want to use their services.

      • Airfried@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        7 days ago

        The line has to go up. That is literally the law. The fact that Youtube has a larger income than Disney doesn’t mean it will stop. They can never stop. They just can crash and burn down eventually but only after making a few people very very rich.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s the damn thing, the line could have gone up through getting more people. They decided less people and higher prices would win… it will not

          • CybranM@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 days ago

            Doesn’t chrome have like a 90% market share? I doubt they can get many more people, therefore need to get more out of the ones they have

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              speaking more to youtube, a bunch of the other alphabet properties.

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not after they demonstrate the power of their evil browser. In a way, you have determined the choice of the ads that you will be shown first.

    • Mexigore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Honestly I don’t think so, the average person won’t bother with changing browser. So they might lose more users but they dont care about those users because they are were using adblock anyways

      • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        101
        ·
        7 days ago

        Brave is by a company who’s in the business of serving ads.

        Much like google was back in the day, they’re trying to obtain market share with a product that they can easily manipulate after the fact and rely on people not jumping ship as things get progressively worse and worse bit by bit

        Think of the “approved ads” era followed by the “enhanced security features” which made it so your block list couldn’t be updated at a moments notice and now it’s being stripped entirely.

        Better to avoid it entirely and just use Firefox or a derivative thereof

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            7 days ago

            “Firefox doesn’t have this one feature I like so I will keep using browser made by an ad company. I’m sure there will be no consequences long term”.

            Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin

            “Oh shit. No one could have predicted this!”.

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Firefox dragged its feet on an extremely useful feature for years.

              Are you seriously trying to act like Firefox hasn’t been continually shooting themselves in the foot the past decade?

              • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                I’ve been using Firefox for decades without issues. Yes, Chrome was a better browser for a long time but Firefox wasn’t that far behind and was absolutely fine browser to use.

                Do you really think Mozilla could win browser race with Google, the fucking second biggest company in the world? Of course Chrome had more features, it had basically unlimited resources at it disposal. But yeah, let’s blame Mozilla for not winning with them decisively.

                YOU are shooting yourself in the foot. You abandoned Firefox for couple of features and soon you will be browsing the web with ads. Come back and tell me how extremely useful Chrome’s features are when can you no longer skip Youtube ads.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              7 days ago

              I swear I hate tabbed browsing, because it leads to people hording tabs like a freaking squirrel hordes nuts.

              If you need it for later, book mark it.

              If you’re done with it close it.

              • karashta@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                6 days ago

                This doesn’t work when I have memory issues. That tab is open as part of my external system of memory for myself so I know what I was trying to do before one of my several issues prevented me finishing.

              • ericwdhs@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Bookmarks in mobile Firefox is another issue. Bookmark management is a massive chore. I end up keeping tabs around a lot longer in mobile just to avoid messing with it.

                On desktop Firefox with the Bookmark Tab Here extension (native functionality I missed from Chrome), bookmarking and organizing a new page is just two clicks. I use that workflow extensively. Apparently I have over 7000 bookmarks all organized that way.

              • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I’ve started using Karakeep for this. If I haven’t used a tab in a while but want it to stick around, throw it to Karakeep, let ai tag it, then close that tab.

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              It’s still not pushed out to phones. I’m going to keep shit talking them until it’s actually out, because they’ve spent far too much time stringing them along

          • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            7 days ago

            People entirely blind to the idea that they can just choose something else instead of 2 piles of shit, one of which has a cherry on top and was sprayed with perfume recently.

          • AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            For a lot of people, it’s an easy transition.

            DDG, Vivaldi, etc. harder transitions.

            Firefox for my parents would result in calls every 3 days for sites that aren’t working right.

            I’m just saying perfect is the enemy of good.

            • Ilandar@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Firefox for my parents would result in calls every 3 days for sites that aren’t working right.

              Very difficult to believe. I have had issues with Firefox over the years but in every single instance it was a result of my custom setup. The browser has no major compatibility issues out of the box. I think it’s way more likely your parents are technologically illiterate and confuse other problems or gaps in their knowledge as issues with the “new” thing (in this case, the browser).

              • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I rarely encounter sites that don’t work with Firefox. I’d be surprised if it’s even 1 per month.

                When that happens, then I just end up opening it in a different browser. I can’t actually remember the last time I’ve needed to do so.

            • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              7 days ago

              Firefox for my parents would result in calls every 3 days for sites that aren’t working right.

              Sorry, what? If they are so tech-illiterate that they have to call you and ask why the website is not working, then what kind of web sites are they visiting?

              Been using FF since 2022 and the only sites that wont work are the ones that utilizes HID. Are your parents trying to flash custom firmware for their phones though browser every third day?

                • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Been in tech longer then that (if for some reason we are doing that now) and I will officially call bullshit on that claim.

                • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I get it that tech people stumble upon these sites much more often than non-techies. My point was that if your parents are having website issues every other day (which implies they are not tech-savvy), then why would they even visit sites that are not FF-compatible. How many sites out of all the web do you think are not compatible with FF? Give an example of a normie site that wont work well with FF.

                  On the other hand, if your parents are tech-savvy then why would they ask you why a website wont load properly? Do you get it that your statement counters itself?

                • Mountainaire@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Wait, really? The access cripplers are crazily powerful add-ons for the paranoid, like NoScript, not the browser itself. Like what example websites, specifically?

            • placebo@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              7 days ago

              calls every 3 days for sites that aren’t working right

              Sir, 2000s called and asked you to return this argument back.

            • mittyta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              It’s true, unfortunately. Not every 3 days, but once a month I encount these sites.

            • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              After seeing all the people talking about Vivaldi in this thread I figured I’d try it out…got to the “Panel” setup page, saw there’s one for reddit, maybe I’ll try adding lemmy.zip…

              Failed Cloudflare check in panel, but it worked in a tab…okay, weird.

              Thought about checking out Kagi since now privacy is on my mind…the front page would reload every 5 seconds so I couldn’t read about it. It’d say “Verification failed please try again” and refresh.

              Apparently this has been an issue with Vivaldi for some time? I guess this is the future of the web? You try to escape the claws of these giant internet powerhouses and they just…don’t let you?

              • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Websites that are actively malicious against firefox, that miraculously work when you have a useragent plugin that makes firefox report that its chrome proving that the site works fine, if the asshole code is removed?

                • AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  Yup mostly because I don’t care anymore. You’re all stating the, “it works on my machine” mantra and I don’t care. See my other comments for some examples.

          • sunbytes@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            On iOS you can go on pornhub on brave and it blocks all the ads and cookie popups.

            That’s one reason that uh… “someone” might use brave.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              7 days ago

              I’ve only ever encountered one website where Firefox didnt work.

              and that was because the website was coded maliciously to reject firefox… a plugin to make it think firefox was chrome and suddenly it ran fine.

              • Sckharshantallas@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 days ago

                Well I did, the Amazon Prime Video has many weird behaviors on Firefox compared to the Chromium engine, even YouTube used to have before.

                Any web developer knows it isn’t as simple as “code once, work everywhere”. If companies don’t test on Firefox (which is a reality nowadays given its small market share) bugs happen in very weird and unusual ways.

                • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Only issue I’ve ever had with Amazon Video was the fact they artificially limit resolution to 320p for people on linux, regardless of browser.

              • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Firefox doesn’t support WebHID, so I can forget about configuring my custom keyboard with anything other than a Chromium based browser.

            • blitzen@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I consider that a website problem, not a me problem. I choose what I do on the internet, the internet doesn’t dictate the software I use.

            • reka@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              My real issue is as a dev of a web application, using Firefox makes things occasionally render differently. It’s only once in a blue moon but enough to make me just accept using Vivaldi to be closer to the defacto user experience. And then I can’t be bothered to switch between FF (I use Zen) and Vivaldi and split my bookmarks, extensions, logins etc. it just doesn’t make sense.

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          Brave has a certain distasteful reputation earned by repeated unethical fuckery. If you are fine with what brave does, you have no reason to avoid chrome in the first place.