(not my image. I just find these comical and incredibly dangerous)

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    common sense?

    But seriously, nothing can stick out beyond the body of the car (expect mirrors), not even wheels.

    Edit: After checking the laws says the fender has to cover the tire to prevent splashing so it may not apply to rims like that. So back to common sense

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      nothing can stick out beyond the body of the car (expect mirrors), not even wheels.

      That might be true for civilised countries.

      But then it’s also the main reason why cars brought over by US military staff fail the inspection for road worthiness here.

      • msfroh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Various US states have fender coverage laws:

        • Fender Coverage Laws: States like California, New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania require the vehicle’s fenders or mudguards to completely cover the width of the tire and wheel assembly. If a rim protrudes past the body of the car, it is a ticketable safety violation.

        Ultimately, the “slab” culture that popularized swangas remains highly localized to Texas and small pockets of the American South precisely because the rest of the world has closed the legal loopholes that allow them.

    • protist@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Common sense is not a law…

      Also the laws are different in different jurisdictions

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I am not a lawyer but EU Regulation No 1009/2010 on type approval requirements for wheel guards states:

        2.1.1. In the part formed by radial planes at an angle of 30° towards the front and 50° towards the rear of the centre of the wheels (see Figure 1), the overall width (q) of the wheel guard shall be at least sufficient to cover the total tyre width (b) taking into account the tyre envelope as well as the extremes of the tyre/wheel combination(s) as specified by the manufacturer. In the case of twin wheels, the tyre envelopes and total width over the two tyres (t) shall be taken into account.

        In short: Nothing is allowed to extend beyond the wheel guards. Now, look at the image above again.

        Deviating materially from the type approval makes your car not street legal as far as I understand. But this is a matter for a lawyer. Surely there is a reason why these psychopathic car mods are impossible to find in all of the EU on public roads.

          • Jiral@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I did not quote “common sense” I quoted relevant law. If you want a full legal analysis rather than seeing relevant law, you need to pay a lawyer.