• I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    2·
    7 days ago

    In case you didn’t know, this is fake.

    You don’t even have to look it up to tell, just use some basic common sense.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      2·
      7 days ago

      In case you didn’t know, this is fake.

      Doesn’t matter. The funny parts are how ludicrous it is, and the (probably intentional) transparent thirstiness of Armando’s reply.

      Neither rely on it being a real thing that actually happened.

      You don’t even have to look it up to tell, just use some basic common sense.

      Right back at you 🤷🏻

  • Yaenntz@fedia.io
    111·
    9 days ago

    Just to be sure everyone gets it, this is a hoax. And it isn’t that funny anymore once you’ve read that the meme is based on a real fact, but it was gender swapped. Classic case of men in power being shitty people™️

    • BreadOven@lemmy.world
      23·
      8 days ago

      Gender-swapped is not the correct term for this. The actual story was sexual assault(s) performed by a male individual. No mention of sexual assaults in the meme.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      14·
      8 days ago

      So it’s funny when a female pastor blows the men in her church, but it’s not funny when a male pastor does it?

      Sounds kinda homophobic, honestly…

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        5·
        7 days ago

        I think the poster described it poorly.

        The way the “funny” version describes it is a woman pastor giving bjs to parishioners - who are assumed in the joke to be willing participants - and later claiming it was part of a religous rite when people found out.

        The real 2019 New Jersey case was about a preacher actually telling impressionable men they had demons in them and tricking them into letting him give them blowjobs.

        The joke is problematic, but the real case is clearly sexual assault.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          2·
          7 days ago

          So the problem is that in the real story, it was coerced? Not that the pastor was a dude?

          Kinda not what the commenter above said at all. Kinda like saying “Nah the sexual assault was okay, the real problem here was the gayness!”

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            2·
            7 days ago

            I was trying to give the poster the benefit of the doubt, and saying they poorly explained why the real situation was worse than the joke. They described it as being about the gender swap, but left out the details regarding how the real event was sexual assault.

            They said it was based on a real fact, but was gender swapped, and that could be read as saying that the problem was the gender swap and not the event itself. I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt and reading it as them saying it was based on a real event which was horrible, and the bit about the gender swap being a clarifying detail that was added poorly.

            • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
              2·
              7 days ago

              They said it was based on a real fact, but was gender swapped, and that could be read as saying that the problem was the gender swap and not the event itself.

              That’s exactly how it reads, and I’m not the only one in this thread who seems to think that. The commenter made it about the problem being “it was actually a man who did this,” not about the actual problem that “it was coerced and an abuse of a position of power/influence.”

              Almost like it reads “Men are evil, so when they do things, it’s evil. But if a woman does the same thing, well, you go girl, slay!”

    • dzsimbo@sopuli.xyz
      8·
      7 days ago

      Thanks for the sauce. Weird-ass world we live in that websites are censoring the word sex while discussing sexual assault.

    • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
      2·
      8 days ago

      Guys this wasn’t sexual assualt, those guys that let that man suck thier dicks had to be at least 25 percent homo.

  • felsiq@piefed.zipEnglish
    71·
    9 days ago

    I’m not a fan of sexual relationships started under an imbalanced power dynamic, but given they’re old enough to be called “men”, this is progress for the church and I’m not going to shit on it

      • BreadOven@lemmy.world
        12·
        8 days ago

        Well the fact that the actual story was sexual assault, which is not implied in the meme, yes. If it was consensual and an older man doing it, what’s the problem?

      • ☭SaltyIcetea☭ @lemmy.ml
        5·
        8 days ago

        hey, as long as everyone is of age and consents, idc how many cocks were sucked

        edit: after re-reading it appears i may have missed a few details in my hurried reading that lead to the conclusion that the consent was questionable. sorry about that.

      • Im_old@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        9 days ago

        you have to pretend you’re walking on a tightrope across a canyon: the trick is to not look down

      • felsiq@piefed.zipEnglish
        2·
        8 days ago

        Assuming that’s the only thing that changed, nope I feel the same way about it. Still problematic, but still less problematic than a lotta the other shit churches get up to lol.

    • cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world
      27·
      8 days ago

      I’m just saying, we let the church burn witches to test that theory out and they found out it was wrong and apologized. Why not let this pastor try out her theological theories and then evaluate the results before we rush into a hasty decision.

  • niva@discuss.tchncs.de
    12·
    5 days ago

    “I have a devil in my dick and some demons in my seman …”

    Sir Psycho Sexy by Red Hot Chilly Peppers

    Maybe she is a fan?

    Edit: The Chilly Peppers were singing about semen not the navy!

  • molten@lemmy.world
    9·
    9 days ago

    Ooh so close! What you’re actually sucking out isn’t demons but semens.

    D for effort though!