Donald Trump floated nominating Ted Cruz to the Supreme Court for a future vacancy on the nation’s high court, joking that the Texas Republican senator’s confirmation would earn unanimous Senate support because senators from both parties would like to see him gone.

Trump, who has mentioned Cruz previously for the Supreme Court, suggested the third-term senator again at an Oct. 27 midterm campaign rally in Lubbock, Texas as the president discussed what he might do if he gets to nominate a Supreme Court justice for a fourth time over his two White House terms.

  • likebudda@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I can only imagine what Clarence’s demands for retirement are. 9 figures minimum with a better RV than the one Colbert offered.

  • Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Why it was critical to elect Dems, the court is fucked due to ignorance. From Socrates to Sagan, they warned about this with a population that can’t think critically, just stuck in dualism. Ubi dubium ibi libertas!

  • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 hours ago

    joking that the Texas Republican senator’s confirmation would earn unanimous Senate support because senators from both parties would like to see him gone.

    Hate him or really hate him, sometimes he says shit that’s funny. It’s amazing how he has absolutely shit on Ted Cruz in particular, and Cruz just continues sucking up.

  • noahm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Reason number 86,384,028 why dems need to take the senate this year. Rs would support this, even if nobody likes Cruz, because they’d be terrified of what MAGAts would do to them if they voted against the president’s nominee.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You are correct on this, but in the last year or so, trump has been less and less successful with getting Rs to “close ranks” like they would usually do. I doubt that would be enough to prevent a SCOTUS nomination though, they’ll definitely all vote to confirm, and probably some Ds as well.

      • noahm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        Assuming Fetterman is still a D. I can’t imagine any others voting to confirm. I mean, it’s fucking Ted Cruz.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I think we should get back to a non-partisan Supreme Court, if that is even possible.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Does a position on the Supreme Court offer discount flight prices to Cancun for when you get heat for your job? Asking on behalf of a shitty Texas senator.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      No discount needed, billionaires just start giving you all expenses paid trips on private jets once you get confirmed.

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They still get criticized for their decisions sometimes. And given how much of a chickenshit coward Cruz is, that flight instinct would definitely kick in at the first sign of criticism.

  • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Wow if I was on the Supreme Court atm I would be worried. “Future vacancy” uttered by fascists sounds like a threat.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Fucking do it.

    Everyone in the Federal government hates Cruz, it’s been the one issue everyone agrees on across the aisle

    If trump puts Cruz on the SC, it virtually guarantees a 2/3 majority to drastically overhaul the SC, and motivate everyone to get it done, just to get rid of Cruz.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      joking that the Texas Republican senator’s confirmation would earn unanimous Senate support because senators from both parties would like to see him gone.

      I fucking resent that he made a joke that was actually funny 😡

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Cruz gotta get 51 votes in the Senate where everyone hates him to be confirmed tho.

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Like a “fuck you, gtfo” vote for a lifetime appointment to the supreme court. Lol., no I didn’t think of that.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I think the running joke is that it would be a unanimous 99-0 vote so they can finally get rid of him

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Is it necessarily set in stone that he has to leave the senate to be on the Supreme Court?

          As far as I know, there’s nothing in US law or the Constitution that says one person can’t do both things.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Even if Dems win the midterms and can force him to nominate actually qualified people he’d still get to appoint them unless the impeachment is lickety split which we know it won’t be.

  • 4am@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Just more confirmation that everything Trump does is revenge against America for making him kill Epstein to keep everything quiet.