• Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    Another fun fact about plant naming conventions: all lettuces* are the same species

    *except wild lettuce but nobody really considers that a lettuce. Still, I guess it would be more correct to say all of the food lettuces are the same species.

    Irrelevant side quest that I went on while double checking this: DuckDuckGo now forwards some search queries to their chatGPT wrapper, which prompted (pun intended) the following interaction:

    1000034205

    • ThanksForAllTheFish@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      More powerful AI says:

      No, not all lettuces are the same species, although many commonly consumed lettuces (e.g., iceberg, romaine, butterhead, oakleaf, and leaf lettuce) belong to the same species, Lactuca sativa.

      However, some plants commonly called “lettuce” belong to different species or even genera. Examples include:

      Lactuca sativa: The typical garden lettuce varieties (iceberg, romaine, butterhead, oakleaf, loose-leaf lettuces).

      Lactuca serriola: Wild lettuce, an ancestor to cultivated lettuce.

      Valerianella locusta: Corn salad or lamb’s lettuce, commonly consumed as lettuce but from a different genus.

      Cichorium endivia: Endive, sometimes called lettuce but technically not in the lettuce genus (Lactuca).

      Eruca vesicaria (Arugula or rocket): Often mixed with lettuces but belongs to an entirely different genus and family.

      In summary, while most common lettuces belong to a single species (Lactuca sativa), not everything commonly called lettuce or used similarly in salads is botanically the same species or even genus.

      • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Are those actually considered lettuces, though? It’s most likely a cultural thing but none of those are lettuces over here. As in, calling them lettuce would be as far fetched as calling spinach lettuce.

  • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    My definition: aggressive spread and resilience to removal.

    Plants that are pretty might get more of a ‘pass’ than ones which are ugly, poisonous or thorny, but ultimately, even the most beautiful flower becomes a weed when it’s suddenly everywhere and you are fighting constantly to get rid of it.

    • GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      aggressive spread and resilience to remove

      Many would argue that mint is an herb. But if you ever had your garden invaded by mint, you’ll definitely classify them under weed.

      Always plant mint in a pot. And if your neighbour has mint in their garden, you better have a 2m trench filled with concrete between their garden and yours.

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          I love stumbling across random information like this. I had no idea that mint spread so aggressively - and will likely never need this information. But it’s fun to learn.

          • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            Not only does it spread aggressively through its roots, but it also grafts onto almost anything. The roots connect to other plants and create new hybrid mints.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      aggressive spread and resilience to removal

      Humans are a weed.

      becomes a weed when it’s suddenly everywhere and you are fighting constantly to get rid of it

      (Humans! :))
      But you are fighting constantly to get rid of it bcs of some arbitrary goals. And the fact it’s spreading means that it’s perfectly adapted for survival in that environment you created, so it’s perfect for that pace.

      • Not_Dav3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        the fact it’s spreading means that it’s perfectly adapted for survival in that environment you created, so it’s perfect for that pace.

        There is such a thing as exotic invasive species that destabilize the local ecosystem, though.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          True. Which still leads to an infestation.

          On non-logarithmic scale:

          And don’t forget that shown is just the last couple of thousand of years - there are 4 more millions of years prior to this of slow growth (and some collapses) but it wouldn’t even register on such a chart.

          Ugh, I guess this is far off topic.

  • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    i call this the weed paradox.

    even though weeds grow unassisted. it is impossible for everyone to grow weeds in their garden. for is they try, they are no longer weeds

  • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    The general definition of a weed is “any plant growing where you don’t want it to be”. A corn plant in a bean field is a terrible weed.

  • callouscomic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Then we go and define things as “invasive” as if the world hasn’t been ever-changing for billions of years. As if we know better and need an environment to remain exactly as we found it, forever. As if nature won’t just fucking figure it out.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      As if nature won’t just fucking figure it out.

      Nature will figure it out, but it won’t necessarily figure it out in a way that’s good for us (or whatever we want to prevent from going extinct).

    • sammer510 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      This is a terrible take. Just because you imagine that nature will “figure it out” doesn’t mean we shouldn’t still try to good stewards of the environment all the same. In LA where I live, the mustard plants that the Spanish spread take over everything and push out the native wildflowers that native pollinators rely on. Then they dry up in the summer because they’re not meant to be here and provide fuel for fires. It I objectively bad for the environment in every measurable way. And don’t get me started on kudzu. The environment is so fucked up BECAUSE of people like you going “Oh nature will just figure it out”. Do better

      • callouscomic@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        California’s general mishandling of nature and natural resources is a great example of what I’m talking about. We don’t have a fucking clue, yet we think we know better, and no lessons get learned despite how clearly wrong our solutions are. Like the wildfires and water “management.”

        To be clear, most other states are also run by morons making idiotic natural resource decisions. California’s just a good example since you brought it up.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    My garden is all weeds. Tons of different plants, but some dominate in certain seasons, growing like 5 feet high. Seems to have avoided anything nasty though, no thistles, nettles or brambles.

    My neighbour’s garden is a thin layer of plastic astroturf. And they let a dog run about on it. Good luck getting dog diarrhoea out of that.

    I know which I prefer.

    • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I wish someone had warned me before No Mow May about brambles.

      1 shoulder injury and a year later I need chainmail gloves and a fucking flamethrower. I fill my green bin with brambles, by the time it’s picked up they’ve grown back.

      The main root is under a shed. I don’t know how to eliminate it.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        The worst I had to deal with was pampas grass, which appears to be a plant made of actual swords.

        I spent three days hacking at it in a coat so I wouldn’t get shredded. When I finally cut the root bulb out it was a cube of wood a foot across. I could barely lift it out, I had to roll it to the bin.

        At least pampas grass doesn’t spread.