It was an “apology” comic of sorts, after the previous one, about how men have it easy, …drew widespread criticism that she took very, very badly.

There’s a fun short video of the BBC’s coverage of the royal funeral that someone dubbed over with the audio of the BBC’s coverage of the Kim funeral.

…eats McDonalds alone and ghosts her. Then repeats every few weeks with love bombs

Something something “cheat day”

How exactly does the private vote thing work? I thought votes being federated was inherent to the way the fediverse is designed.

Frankly, that’s kind of insane. It would make sense to grandfather in existing cars or have an exception for old-timers, but “someone stamped it, whatever” is just begging for abuse.

It’s not even IT itself. I vaguely remember some fruit juice company changing its name from “fruit juice” to “fruit juice blockchain” or something, and doing nothing else, and it’s stock price jumping by 3x. The stock market somehow got into its head that tech companies play by fundamentally different rules than normal, are worth inherently more, never have to make profit or even a product, and will someday all be money printing monopolies.

A few years ago, “blockchain” was what “AI” is now. Everyone was adding blockchain to everything. It was the next big thing, we can’t risk getting left behind, etc.

That much is true, but I don’t think I wouldn’t call this “good comedy”, and judging from the replies in the thread - OP included - I don’t think it’s intended as a joke either, mild or otherwise. It is kinda amusing, in that victory is presented as always impossible, but I doubt that was intentional. This isn’t goodnatured ribbing, this is more, as the kids say, bait.

I don’t want to bicker, it’s just confusing that people who are presumed worth talking to seem to almost exclusively be yelled at.

Kinda makes me wonder if maybe some of the people currently not worth talking to were previously subjected to a similar talking to.

You call this “talking to”?

Talk about careful wording lol. Very well done.

Provided you have time, and the groceries available, and the…

Point is, taking every observation personally is missing the forest from the trees. Objecting to overuse of cars is an objection to a systemic issue (usually insufficientpublic transport), and it won’t be solved by individual action. Responding to it with “Well, I need a car, actually…” is missing the point. Same with delivery: getting into a “well, I can’t walk to food” “well, you should cook”, “well, I …” is missing the point of “there’s a whole mess of traffic that’s both expensive and has been managed without earlier - that’s weird, wonder what changed to cause it?”

Don’t expect problems to have neat, individually actionable solutions. Most don’t.

Absolutely. People will call you a bot, then vomit out an argument ChatGPT have them without even reading it.

Frankly, it’s what I did, too, after coming out of Uni-level C.

My code was goddamn unreadable.

Especially if it just shows up on your playlist and you tell your friends it’s just some obscure Elvis song.

OK, now that’s just weird!

Celentano isn’t being weird, though, he’s just proving a point

The phrase you are being nudged towards is “false positive”.

You joke, but just out of shot was a crowd of onlookers holding signs in support of the chimp.

It’s honestly incredible how on point that whole meme was.