WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]

“Open source projects reject cocaine code over copyright concerns”

I voted 3rd party. If only I had voted 1.6 million more times for KH, I could have changed the outcome of the election!

It’s all she had to do: promise to not send a single dime to genocidal fascists. she had years of opportunity to fight her own president for that kind of change too.

Even just staying silent on the issue would be enough to differentiate her from Biden for many. She couldn’t even avoid talking about how much she hated college students, but yet people act surprised those demographics didn’t go out to vote. Weird how insulting potential voters and explicitly telling them you don’t care about their vote leads to not getting their vote.

Given she avoided taking positions on most issues until the week of the election (other than to oppose healthcare and support fracking), I have a hard time believing someone in the campaign wasn’t intentionally trying to throw the election…

Na, tests were too much fun to waste on cheating.

Shout-out to my labmate who couldn’t use a micropipette correctly but didn’t know it, ruining data from collaborative projects with people on multiple occasions.

Of course someone on .world would say that. /j

Not going to places like 4chan and the trump subreddit hardly seems like being in a bubble. Those place seem more like places you only go to if you are in a specific bubble. Not suggesting those places haven’t used it that way, but rather I don’t think normies spend enough time in places where they’d see clear examples like that.

That said, I’m certainly aware that I prefer small online communities, which leads to biased views on things.

Where do you see it used that way?

Allegedly?

It already happens. Look at things like pipeline leaks poisoning the water supply for certain native groups. There’s obviously protests against such projects that will inevitably lead to said poisoning, people get arrested for protesting, and then they do the project anyways.