Both Trump and his “border czar,” Tom Homan, have said California officials could face arrest if they’re perceived as impeding ICE operations.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom pushed back against threats of arrest by Trump administration officials, remaining defiant as he oversees clashes between law enforcement agents and protesters in response to immigration raids across Los Angeles while also managing an ongoing power struggle with the federal government.

In an interview for MSNBC with NBC News’ Jacob Soboroff, Newsom called Homan’s bluff, urging him to “just get it over with” and move ahead with the arrest.

“He’s a tough guy. Why doesn’t he do that? He knows where to find me,” Newsom said. “That kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let’s go."

  • AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    One guy who’s actively defying this orange turd and all the fucking tankies on here would rather shit on Gavin because he’s not the perfect online liberal like they are.

    You people are the fucking problem right now.

    • kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      He’s thrown vulnerable people under the bus and has no principles other than what he thinks will help his career. Yeah, he’s doing the right thing here, but let’s not pretend he’s good because he’s doing the bare minimum

      We can work with him while recognizing he’s not a true ally

        • AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fucking this.

          Furthermore, when people won’t even cook at all (online leftists who do fucking nothing but complain), they have no space to complain when someone is doing any cooking.

          • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Only the sith deal in absolutes. Idealism is for idealists, aka tools. We are flawed beings, living in a flawed world, we have to deal with flaws. Nothing and nobody will ever be perfect for anything and everyone, that’s not a good reason to let fascists have their way. We can work out the details after the revolution.

            • AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              ‘The Left’ isn’t going to do shit in their ‘revolution’ except talk about it online.

              They don’t show up to anything.

              • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yeah, that’s why there are so many protests going on right now with people being arrested for confronting and resisting the current administration, because leftists never do anything, right?

                • AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yeah I see tons of actual people protesting, not the terminally online Leftists here.

                  Regular people are fighting, not the tankies ;)

        • Wazowski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because it signals noncompliance, fucking obviously. And it is consistent with the lawsuit he’s filing, so it’s not just empty words.

          JFC.

          • twistypencil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Signaling non-compliance? There is a vast gap between actually resisting and signaling. Signaling is not resisting. It’s free speech, constitutionally protected, significant case law behind it, and not actually resisting.

          • twistypencil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It’s called free speech. It’s quite simple the difference between free speech and resistance. Resistance in this context would be actually fighting physically to get away from a lawfully parameterized arrest. Even when under arrest, if someone were to say I’m not going with you, that is not resisting. By saying come arrest me that is not resistance. That is simply a taunt or a command or a suggestion or a joke or sarcasm or any other method of constitutionally protected free speech, not in the least bit resistance.

            Are you responding to the comment about Rosa Parks? Because if so then I have responded to the wrong thing