• ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I feel like if you’re writing the sentence “an optional, paid version of our browser that offers Brave […] without its extra features,” you need to sit back and take a long, hard look at yourself.

    • kepix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      won so much uninstall when it showed a world cup advert to everyones face the other day. the forks are great, but the fox is getting enshitificated in every possible way.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          On the mobile app, when you open it there’s a non-removable FIFA widget in the home page. I hate it.

          Edit: I’ve tried again and now they added an option to remove it. But still, why would I want a fucking soccer widget in my browser?

          • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Yeah it’s doing that to me too. The ‘Countdown to the world cup’ thing? Fuck the world cup, fuck these ads, I’m only still using Firefox because I can’t be bothered to migrate all my bookmarks to something better.

            • Scrollone@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Exactly, and the world cup of soccer is managed by FIFA, one of the most evil organisations in the world.

              Firefox is a beautiful product managed by a retarded company. Mozilla should die and just become a non-profit.

              • Someone8765210932@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                FIFA, one of the most evil organisations in the world

                Sorry, but no matter how bad and corrupt FIFA is, calling them that is ridiculous. Your average American health care/insurance company and their “deny, defend, depose” operation is probably worse.

            • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              What would be better though?
              I have my problems with mozilla, but between apple, google and mozilla, they absolutely win in my book.

      • Joelk111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I also use a fork on most systems, but I still use Firefox pretty often, and I can think of a lot more ways it could be worse and isn’t being enshittified.

  • Diego@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Brave Origin’s main feature isn’t what it adds but what it removes: it scraps email aliases, Leo AI, the VPN tool, the Brave Wallet implementation, and Speedreader, just to name a few features. You can either download a browser with all of those disabled, or you can upgrade your Brave browser with a panel that lets you tweak what ones you want to keep.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The bad news is, if you’re not on Team Tux, you’re going to have to pay $60 for Brave Origin. Granted, you only need to buy it once, and you’ll get unlimited activations across all of your devices.

    It’s amazing people still believe this BS.

    • Liana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They’ll probably hold to it for that exact product. If they rebrand it and add it back, that’s no longer the same thing you paid for ;)

      • dbtng@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Ya, that’s the really obvious take. That’s teh way you do biz these days.
        Like, that’s what’s gonna happen to all those ‘lifetime’ Plex accounts. Sure, you still have access to ‘Plex-classic’. But you don’t get any of the new Plextastic services … unless you want to pay the $1,999 upgrade fee …

        • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          If I get to use the exact product I paid for a lifetime account for forever that does kinda sound like exactly what I paid for.

          • dbtng@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Trust me. You need Plextastic. Its got all the cool new stuff. Just a small fee.
            You will come around.

  • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    259
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Yet people keep recommending products by this scummy company and pile on Firefox for slightest missteps.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      135
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Mozilla should be scrutinized, even if Firefox is currently the best option.

      I think the only thing keeping them inline is loud community backlash everytime they make one of those misssteps.

      • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think everyone should be held to the same standard. We can yell at Firefox a bit less. We should yell at Brave a lot more.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        17 hours ago

        People dont seem to be scrutinizing though. Its genuinely unhinged and often completely misinformed. They will jump on a single line of a legal text and use it to springboard into a world of scenarios even when Mozilla is saying its not true.

        It doesnt help improve the product it just makes people think all products are bad and fallback to whatever the comfortable majority is which is chrome.

        • CubitOom@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Sometimes corporations lie.

          It’s not being unhinged to say you don’t like something. And the way that Mozilla is embracing “AI” is not welcomed.

      • zewm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Sorry man, but the minute Firefox added that keylogger, I dipped.

        Firefox rendering engine is dogshit and they are massively behind.

        This coming from someone that was using Netscape and Mozilla and Firefox since its release.

        • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Firefox doesn’t include a keylogger. It does have the infamous privacy preserving attribution but this can easily be disabled in settings.

          In contrast, Chrome is literally a tool for Google to gain as much personal information as possible for Googles advertisement platform. It has the worst privacy features of the three major browsers and cannot be fully made private due to crippled extension support.

          Firefox engine has some catching up to do, but the Safari rendering engine is behind Firefox on features.

        • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I don’t know what you’re on about. There is no keylogger and I don’t have any issues with the engine unless it’s some weird ass “chrome experiments” style website which I couldn’t care less about.

        • CubitOom@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I find LibreWolf to be the better option for privacy, I never have an issue with rendering.

        • Liana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          You either die a Netscape Navigator, or you live long enough to become a… any of em, really.

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Alternatives being even worse doesn’t make firefox good, or invalidate any objective criticism against it.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They removed the paw, they are worse than Chrome! I’m going to use an alternative version that cannot exist without the main project to teach them a lesson!

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      All of the current browsers have major drawbacks. Brave has many features that other browsers don’t offer. They’ve made what is quickly becoming the industry standard adblocker, being adopted by Firefox, Waterfox, Comet, and even Ladybird browser. No extensions required.

      Most browsers don’t allow you to easily toggle on and off certain privacy features on a per-site basis. That’s why I use it primarily.

      Origin is free on Linux.

      Until Servo and Ladybird are ready, this strikes the best balance for privacy and usabllity, in my opinion

      • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Most browsers don’t allow you to easily toggle on and off certain privacy features on a per-site basis

        I don’t know what “certain features” are. LibreWolf lets me easily enable WebGL on per-site basis and uBlock could always do that anyway. I don’t need to touch anything else.

        Origin is free on Linux.

        Yes, and you can also toggle everything off via config. That does not matter, it’s still a scummy move that should be ridiculed. How, exactly, is a dashboard that toggles some settings on or off is worth 60 dollars? It’s not “paying for convenience” it’s a tax on tech incompetency.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Brave has many features that other browsers don’t offer

        Such as? Crypto nonsense?

        The adblocker? OK I guess, except they are still just a middle man for ads (hence the crypto nonsense).

        I dont see the value.

      • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’m curious how their adblocker blocks more than 100% of all ads, cuz that’s what they’d need to beat ublock (which existed before brave did).

        • naeap@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          To be fair, he said something about built-in
          But I’m with you
          The choice of high quality ad Blockers per addon is nothing that’s wrong with Firefox

  • Imhereforfun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    You don’t need to pay anything if you go to the settings and disable them one by one. Brave is the best browser out there and only browser I have used since 2019.

    • moopet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You don’t need to pay anything to eat this delicious succulent meal, as long as you pick out the maggots first.

    • philpo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Brave was founded by a known homophobe who donated to Anti-LGBT projects and that was figure in the Covid - conspiracy circles . It is known to have injected stuff into their clients data, e.g. affiliate links, has leaked Tor data, etc.

      It is by far the most shady and bad major browser.

  • dbtng@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    So much venom. That’s weird. Because they are all useful to some degree or another.

    I use Brave. (The free one. Obviously.)

    And I use Vivaldi. And Firefox. And Waterfox.
    And even Chrome.

    I do a lot of work through browser-based utilities. I like to set one browser up with all my server clusters pinned. This is the Brave/Vivaldi role. It doesn’t go online, just server mangement.
    And I’ll set up Chrome with all my work sites. Because that’s the standard, and its gonna run all that work shit reliably. Login to my work google here.
    And I want a dirty actual-browser with uBlock, SuperStop, and kill-sticky. Usually Firefox. Might get my personal gmail here.
    If I’m on a machine where I need an additional role, or perhaps some extension that I don’t want in my main browser, I install another browser to handle it.
    They are tools, folks. Use em. Don’t let them use you. Don’t be a tool.
    :]

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Reminds me of a joke:

    My dad always warned us about Septic Tank Steve, and that we should never pay him to do anything, and we should have listened. One day Steve came by and said if we gave him a nickel, he’d swim around in the septic tank. We thought that was hilarious, so we gave him a nickel, and he swam around the tank a while. Then he came and sat next to us on the porch and said “If you want me to leave, gimme $100.”