• CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    What would happen if everyone cancelled their health insurance and stopped paying outrageous surprise medical bills?

    Because doing the “right” thing and hoping it will get better someday isn’t working very well.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Some people would die. In the end the survivors would be far better off. Question is mostly how long it would take. Could the medical/insurance industry make it without changing a thing for more than a month without health insurance? More than 6?

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Some people would die.

        That’s the hard part. But as a random pedantic internet asshole, I have to point out that the current system is also causing deaths.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I left the hospital with a drain in me.

    Had to follow up to get it taken out - they only did drain removals one afternoon of the week. Something that took me thirty seconds to do when I got fed up and did it myself.

  • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    For the non-Americans out there:

    This isn’t even an exaggeration. This was literally my exact experience going to the ER after I got fired.

  • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    ·
    9 days ago

    12 hours and $35k? Stop your bullshit. I’ve dealt extensively with healthcare in the US. It’s more like 10 months and $110k.

    My partner is literally waiting 10 months to see a rheumatologist for debilitating joint pain. A virtual visit, no less.

    • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      9 days ago

      Last year my best friend got diagnosed with cancer, and his VA docs let him sit 3 months between appointments. By the time they offered a treatment plan, he had become terminal, almost a year in. He died last June. It’s really quietly horrifying to see it play out in real-time.

      • Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        But on the bright side, the insurance company probably saved a lot of money. And as you know, line going up is more important than quality of life going up or even staying alive. /s

        I’m sorry about your friend, nobody deserves that.

    • javasux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 days ago

      Are these doctors just seeing patients all day, every day? If not, I can’t imagine how they could possibly justify making someone wait 10 months for a virtual visit.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        9 days ago

        A rheumatologist? Basically. Any ‘old person’ specialty is hard to get an appointment in because they’re booked out for ages, unless you’re lucky and live near a bunch of them or have insurance with a really big network of providers.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 days ago

        Honestly? A lot of them are. They also might have a few hours during the day where they review lab results or imaging for their various patients.
        A lot of the specialists don’t work for a hospital or anything, so they’re basically a doctor and also a small business owner in a business with a very long ramp up time and uncertain demand on the timeframe that you can make the decision to work in the field. So you end up with “how many people do you think will have arthritis in five years, and how many people do you think will have decided to become rheumatologists by then?” And if you’re wrong you’re still a rheumatologist and you basically just need to move someplace that needs one and hope you can run a business.

        You might luck out if you’re near a big medical facility that’s involved in teaching, because then you might end up with several doing teaching and research.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        It can easily happen anywhere.

        E.g. in the UK, someone I know had to wait 18 months for an (online) assessment for ADHD. I was along as a character reference, since I have ADHD myself, so could point out the bits they forgot (due to ADHD).

        At the end, they apologised again for the delay. Apparently, since COVID, they have been receiving almost as many referrals in a week than they used to in a year. It takes a long time to train new doctors, particularly in specialist positions. They were swamped.

        Many specialists are in the same boat, even before insurance companies get involved.

    • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 days ago

      Are you saying people are sitting around waiting at the emergency room for 10 months at a time and it’s a regular thing in the US?

      • Zachariah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 days ago

        They send you away for everything except imminent death. You then have to book an appointment with a specialist instead, and it’s at least a month from now.l if you’re lucky.

    • AzuranAurora@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 days ago

      The American healthcare system killed my grandpa by waiting so long to care for his severe foot infection that his heart (which was already damaged from a heart attack 15ish years prior) couldn’t handle the strain anymore and he passed away. I will never forgive that hospital or the insurance companies involved, and I never even got to say goodbye to him. That kind of shit doesn’t happen as frequently here in Canada and I am thankful for the system we do have, flaws and all.

    • fartographer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      Look, some sacrifices are gonna have to be made if we want to continue having the best healthcare on earth.

      Fortunately, we’ve mastered the sacrificing part, now we just have to tackle beginning “to continue having.”

    • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      To be fair I had to have an organ removed due to exploding or something. It took less than 24 hours. Then insurance denied it-no way to tell if said exploding organ was an elective surgery or required by the doctor who required us to do it.

      Apparently all the cool kids are doing elective organ removal these days.

  • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    9 days ago

    I had a 14ga puncture wound last year in Canada, about 1" from my femoral artery. Rapidly flowing blood, tourniquet applied on-scene just below the groin.

    Ambulance was on scene quickly, I was immediately put into the trauma center in the ER, stapled, full body CT with contrast, tetanus booster and some more stuff I don’t remember. Time in ER waiting room: zero. Time in hospital: ~1.5 hr total, mostly spent waiting for a follow up outside the ER.

    I paid $250 for the ambulance and nothing else. Canada’s healthcare system is GREAT at keeping you alive (if you’re not indigenous, which is a true national shame).


    Canada’s healthcare system is not amazing at keeping you healthy. Something minor and chronic? Get fucked, it’s a 2 year wait for a specialist referral. Minorly hurt but not at risk of death? Yeah enjoy the 4-10 hour wait in the ER room. When will you be seen? Idk when we can get to it. Want to see a doctor? Walkin will see you for free in about 45 minutes. Want to see your doctor? Yea they’re out this month working at the hospital, how’s 3 months from now?


    All of this is vastly better than my time growing up in the US where the hospital missed diagnosing me with pneumonia and gave me permanent lung scarring. Or missed my fractured ankle on the xray and said I was fine. And then billed my parents 10’s of thousands of dollars.

    • BurntWits@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      9 days ago

      Canada’s healthcare system is GREAT at keeping you alive

      Canada’s healthcare system is not amazing at keeping you healthy

      This is perhaps the most accurate explanation I’ve ever heard for our healthcare system here in Canada. I’m definitely going to use this in future.

    • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      I will say, in my city, our family doctor is in office at least 4 days a week.

      If you dont have a scheduled slot, you can see another in the same clinic tho, but usually you wanna schedule if possible.

      If you give them a few hours heads up before leaving, you can usually be in and out in lile an hour total which is fine imo for non-energency.

      For emergencies you are not spending any time in the waiting room yeah, they are pretty good at fixing you up fast.

      If you just go to a hospital 15 minutes out of town at a smaller city, non emergency wait times plummet tremendously.

      We have like 3 hospital options where I live, to go to, that are an extra 15min drive but 1/10th the wait times for non-emergency.

      Politicians love to pick the one hospital dead center of the city that is the busiest one and cherry pick its busiest time of year as average wait times.

      In reality its the exception and most other hospitals are faster, and 1 city out from the major one and hospital wait times are negligible.

  • Loaf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    9 days ago

    American here. Reluctantly went to the ER because I had been vomiting for a couple of days. Turned out that my gallbladder just stopped working. Was immediately placed into a room, given IV antibiotics, and had surgery the next morning.

    Had to stay for 4 days to make sure I was in good shape. The surgery wasn’t super expensive, but the room itself cost me way too much.

    Total cost was just over $24k. No insurance (contractor). Even on payments, it’s insane.

    My plan is to just never get sick for the rest of my life so I don’t go into another debt hole.

    • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      9 days ago

      I ended up in the emergency room last year.

      The ambulance ride was something like $1200, which I’ve come to learn was “cheap” comparatively speaking, as they’re typically thousands of dollars each. My insurance didn’t cover the cost of that ambulance because the particular service that picked me up was out-of-network. Insurance also didn’t cover the ibuprofen I was given for pain citing the fact that they require prior authorization for it. Two ibuprofen alone cost me $40.

    • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      9 days ago

      You can haggle with them. Save up a few k and then call them offering to pay a lump sum to settle the debt. A few years ago I broke my wrist and ended up with a 16k bill. I got 3k together, called them, told them I’m poor AF, that they could take the 3k or nothing. They took the 3k.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 days ago

        There’s a horror in having to haggle for the price of your healthcare whilst in the hospital.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        Similar story back when I didn’t have insurance for a bit. In my case the hospital billing actively offered a settlement when I called and asked about options.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 days ago

        The worse part is that this is totally dependent on who your insurance is, and you don’t know prices on anything until the bill shows up 3 months later. You or your doctor also might have to fight your insurance to prove a procedure is necessary, or that a medication needs to be covered. Most times you can expect your procedure to not be covered, so you have to tell the insurance company that yes, this is covered, here’s why it was necessary (usually this first round of rejection is done via having an algorithm or ML setup “review” the case).

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 days ago

        You seemed to miss the part where he said the surgery wasn’t all that expensive, it was the stay in the hospital that was.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        In some sense the US system is more reflective of the “true” cost of healthcare, just in the least humane way possible.

        Take a country with “bad” socialized healthcare: Patient pays some percentage of visit cost, government pays the rest.
        You break your leg: ambulance with two EMTs is $100/hr, 2 x-rays at $10/per, $30 in assorted bandages and plaster, and $150/hr for a doctor. Total patient cost: some percentage of $300.

        The US system charges all those, but also reflects the cost of those things existing and being available as reflected in patient usage. The socialized system sees the ambulance ride as distinct from when the community needs a new ambulance, or the cost of having EMTs available 24/7/365.
        Likewise, you get charged not just for the bandaging, but the cost of the person who brought the bandage to the nurse applying them, the cost of the person tracking the inventory, and the cost of the nurse isn’t included in the medical care. Your room isn’t charged as a room but as the room plus the services of everyone who keeps a hospital room ready to go.
        A socialized system just happily says “of course a hospital needs skilled janitors and maintenance people, but only an idiot would call what they do patient care”

        No one notices the cost of every hospital janitor and HVAC specialist in an entire country being divided amongst the entire tax base. You do when your share of the salary of all of them at your local hospital gets added to a bill addressed to you.

        Our system is the way it is because otherwise no one pays for the pharmacist, and insurance caps things weirdly. Also, you have to multiply everything by 3 because the insurance company will refuse to pay anything above 1/3 of “list” price.

        It may be outstandingly cruel, but it is good also terrible at providing cost transparency. Which is worthless to everyone except accountants at work paying for healthcare.

        So yeah. That’s cheap, and the WTF goes deeper than most people can imagine.

        • 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          9 days ago

          Don’t all of those costs have a profit counted into them? I’ve always thought that a socialized system is incentivized to be as cheap as possible, to have as few “customers” as possible, which means that the whole system, from education to taxation, should make policies that improve people’s health, to make sure they need to use the hospital as rarely as possible.

          • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Yes, but that’s socialism and therefore bad.

            /S just in case

            Edit: actually, it’s lost potential revenue which is even worse.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            That depends a lot on the medical system. Some systems target profit, but some are non-profits, affiliated with universities or other arrangements that make sense for a medical system.

            The city I live in has two main hospitals. One is run by a for profit corporation. The other was a non-profit that got government funding to cover the difference because they were the main “ER as only healthcare” hospital in the area, since the other was built on the rural side of the suburbs and this one was in the middle of the population center. Then they got bought by, of all things, another non-profit operated by a public university. The first non-profit also owned a for-profit insurance company and a fitness center. I think the disposition of those is an ongoing legal question, since the university also owns an insurance company and there’s some weird conflict of interest interplay.

            It’s a clusterfuck but the redeeming side is that the hospitals are actually extremely good.

            Having at some point or another used all three systems I can say that the prices were basically the same. The staff all like that they can transfer patients to the university easier, but dislike the new parking system.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Yeah it’s actually a serious problem how many hospitals in the US are non profits run by religious organizations. Like, your local ER has a decent chance of being owned by the catholic church and you won’t know until you need medical care they don’t approve of.

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                Yup, it’s preposterously cruddy. I like my random bits of research so I happen to know the ownership details of my local institutions, but that’s far from common. And even if it was, it’s not like you even get a choice if you’re in need, if you even had options to choose from.

                The previous non-profit, the one that got purchased by the university, started as a charitable outreach from a local women’s group in the 1890s. Then a business man donated some land and money and they made a proper hospital.
                The Catholic “hospital” was a ghoulish dive that was basically a small ER with a few other beds and offices. Eventually they got bought out by the womens group hospital and turned into a sleep medicine and medical imaging annex.

                I’m just realizing we have three hospitals which feels like a lot for a city this size.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yes and, insurance companies spread out their costs among all their enrollees, whether or not they have to use those hospital services and equipment, in the form of premiums. (And of course they add on the cost of their CEO’s yacht, etc. because evil.) So that’s how they “save you” a portion of the billed amount.

          But having so many uninsured people, whether healthy or sick, that aren’t even part of the system hurts everyone.

          Which is why we need to eliminate the insurance racket, make healthcare universal and pay for it through taxes, perhaps a sliding scale based on net worth as long as I’m fantasizing.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 days ago

      Medical debt aside, (not that it’s not important) you are an example of something that’s true about both systems: If you are at death’s door you’ll get treatment immediately, even if it’s just to stop you actively dying and stabilize you enough to wait for admission to the ICU. If you are waiting 12 hours in the ER before being seen by anyone but Triage, you’re probably the least sick/wounded person there.

      Maybe instead of cursing the nurses and doctors, muster up the most powerful curse you can conjure, and send it to the germs and cancer cells in the Children’s Ward. Can’t hurt, might help. I like to start with “Fuck you, you filthy neuroblastomas! With your disgusting corrupted DNA and misshapen tumors oozing and squooging into places you don’t belong! Just fucking shrivel up and die! Don’t you know nobody wants you here? You’re fucking waste, so waste yourself and go out the shithole!”

      Then see if you can call some good vibes for a quick resolution to the people who look miserable enough to be ahead of you. You’re on your own there, I’m not so good at prayers or that kind of thing.

      Also a summertime reminder: a lot of people in the ER these months will be getting an IV because they’re severely dehydrated. And others will be getting an IV because their ability to withstand whatever else they have will be improved by getting better hydrated. You can help keep yourself and your friends out of there by pre-emptively drinking more water and non-alcoholic no-caffeine drinks, and being a …did “hydro homie” get ruined when I wasn’t paying attention?

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 days ago

      Remember, you can make payments, they just don’t have to be the suggested amount. $10 a month for life.

      I don’t recall if medical debt impacts credit ratings like others. It shouldn’t in a sane world, but here we are.

      • Loaf@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 days ago

        So far, that total hasn’t, but there was a $985 bill for something relating to the stay that did hit my credit as a “derogatory mark.”

        I hate this system lol.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 days ago

          Based on the price and it affecting your credit, it must have been something that you asked for, rather than needed. Like a couple of Tylenol for pain.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 days ago

            I’m beginning to think if I need to call 911 for myself, I should grab a couple Tylenol to take with me, even if I’m not sure it’s a good idea to actually take them. In my experience it’s possible to get permission from a doctor to take one’s usual home meds and the nurse will chart that you did so. In my husband’s case it was Evrysdi, which they were very glad we could provide, and his insurance (Platinum Plan because he needs it) did cover Tylenol, but I bet mine doesn’t.

      • QualifiedKitten@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        I recently wound up with a ~$300 ER bill while unemployed for an extended period. I tried to negotiate a payment plan, and they insisted the minimum payment was $100/month. So, they got zero.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s a great plan until it’s not. If you’re able to, I’d highly recommend looking into getting Obamacare if you can’t get insurance through an employer due to being a contractor. I don’t know your personal situation, but Obamacare plans are often more reasonable than people imagine.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        Obamacare is getting gutted bit by bit. You might have noticed the enrollment has dropped. This is because the premiums are way up, it’s now harder to get a subsidy to offset this, there are less insurance companies available, and the plans that are there now cover less. If Dems don’t win in the midterms, it’s toast.

      • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Romneycare*

        Never let Republicans forget that the best socialized healthcare system in the country was copied from a Republican system created and approved by voters in one of the most leftist states in the nation. It makes them so mad that they can’t blame a black guy for it when you do.

    • titanicx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      My gf had a mini stroke a few weeks ago. We were traveling so didn’t go to the hospital right away, mostly because she hates them and is terrified of the bill. On the way home and got way worse. We went immediately. They tried to tell us it was nothing more then a headache, and charged us 18k. I’m also a contractor so even if I could get insurance, because I’m not married to her I would have to pay double. Fuck this system.

    • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      That instant room you got is nothing special, but just how triage works. I came to the emergency room some years ago, shitting and vomiting my guts out, and they placed me in quarantine faster than I could hand over my insurance card. Come with a sore ankle and wait until the other patients are stabilized.

      (Germany)

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    9 days ago

    When I went to Econ class, the professor explained that we call it “Free Market Economics” because of four freedoms:

    1. Freedom of entry and exit - participants (buyers, sellers, and prospective such) can enter or exit the market at their leisure, and the market will not change
    2. Freedom of participation - every participant is in the market of their free will and can leave the market without repercussion
    3. Freedom of substitution - every product on a particular market is essentially the same
    4. Freedom of information - every participant has the same information about availability and prices at the same time

    The reward is that free markets are efficient: they lead to the lowest prices and greatest exchange of goods. That is the reason we have them.

    When the four freedoms are not mandated, the market fails in different ways, and that’s absolutely expected. When information is available to some before it is to others, we get price distortions - that’s where insider trading laws come from.

    Health care, the prof explained, suffers from the fact there is no freedom of participation. You either buy care or you suffer the potentially deadly consequences. That’s why free markets and health care are fundamentally incompatible: they are expected to be.

    • Spitefire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      9 days ago

      Healthcare is the literal example of inelastic demand my prof used to teach us the concept. If you die without it, then there is no price where a reasonable actor can choose to stop participating in the market.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        Well, it’s a little elastic.

        Non-fatal health conditions that lots of people put up with. Someone I knew went to ER for first kidney stone, then just endured the pain the second time until they could get a non-emergency appointment, since it’s non-fatal but agonizing, and a non-emergency visit is like 80% cheaper.

        Lots of people just accept chronic problems, for example joint pain without seeking medical examination.

        Of course, in many cases, hard to make an informed decision on whether it is or is not one of those life or death scenarios in many cases.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah, but that holds as much water as my argument in macro 100 about gas being elastic because of how many people scoff at the shell price and look for a sunoco. I did it when I drove every day (in a city with a high density of gas stations), and I will now take other forms of transportation if gas is too expensive, but that’s not common behavior, nor is it normally logical (saving five cents per gallon, driving an extra five miles, and wasting twenty minutes is not a true savings for most people).

          It’s technically true, but in an academically idealized market, it wouldn’t be.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I feel like #3 no longer exists for anything in the US economy. You get one product in each niche either owned by 3 companies whose executives all have lunch together (egg farms, meat, ram manufacturers, etc) or where its just absolutely so black boxed its unclear what the product actually is (windows, google, ai etc)

    • NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      There’s no freedom of information either. Good luck getting your healthcare provider (your doctor, the hospital) to tell you how much any given procedure will cost in advance.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I believe it’s called inelastic demand: things you don’t stop buying even when prices go up.

      See also: housing, food (though you may eat less or eat other foods, but you still need food).

    • Cheebus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      #4 Doesn’t seem to be a thing anymore, president seems to get away with all the insider trading he wants PLTR tweets and what not

    • jdr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Are free markets efficient? I think that’s an open question.

  • TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    9 days ago

    Cut my finger off twice, almost lost my foot to sepsis whilst camping, and was witness/transport for 2 different heart attacks.

    Longest I’ve waited for serious treatment is about 5 minutes, most expensive was a 50$ parking ticket.

    You’re being fleeced like fools

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    9 days ago

    In America they shut down hospitals because the publicly traded corporation which bought the hospital realized it was more profitable to run 1 hospital per 5 counties.

  • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    9 days ago

    An ex had bad abdominal pain one night.

    Trip to ER deemed emergency: free.
    Night doctor determined likely gall stone, kept overnight in ER to be confirmed by morning ER doc: free. Morning doctor determined non-critical issue, added to wait list and scheduled checkin with specialist in 2 months All free.

    Same pain next night. Same song and dance, ambulance, same ER night doctor, this time he stays overtime to ensure that it gets an ultrasound booked. Ultrasound later that morning determines it needs to come out. Admitted same day for surgery. Bumped two days because literal life and death surgeries(c-sections and a motorcycle v car accident victim) and some time to let the surgeon have some sleep. He shows up and gets it done first thing.

    Two weeks later, end up getting minor surgery for drain removal because her parent’s cat purred on her nonstop and overhealed the drain scar.

    All free.

    Tldr: the Canadian system works on priority and is hobbled by conservatives.

    • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Every conservative government cuts funding for every provincial healthcare system and then acts like the idea is flawed after they kneecapped it by limiting nursing hiring, freezing/reducing funding, and doing the 400th reorg to “find efficiencies”. They shuttered 3 ERs in my city against the pleas of the College of Physicians and our ER wait times went up a couple hours overnight.

      Who could have guessed?

      I will vote Liberal, I will vote NDP, I will vote Green, I will never vote conservative.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 days ago

        This is common and a literal conservative tactic called “starving the beast”. You strangle off funding to a thing you wanna cut, wait a couple months for the service to go to shit because they have to realign to compensate for having no money, and then go “wow look this sucks, better just kill it”.

        Reagan did it in the 80s.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 days ago

          The “beast” in their narrative is “money going to poor people instead of me and my friends” lest you think any shred of what they do is defensible.

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 days ago

    People who think America has better healthcare are either wealthy, or don’t have any health issues they deal with regularly.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Even upper middle class Americans have shitty healthcare. But many or most of them are proud of learning the system so they refuse to consider that they could have been getting fucked their whole lives.

      • Folstar@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s a good point. If I had a dollar for every time someone smugly explained a horrific aspect of American healthcare like I’m an idiot for not knowing it, well, I still wouldn’t have enough dollars to go see a doctor, but it has happened a lot.

  • blattrules@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 days ago

    Accurate. I had an afib issue recently, went to the hospital at 9pm and sat there in the emergency room bed all night because they told me the cardiologist needed to see me before they could treat me. The cardiologist got in at 9am, and I continued to wait until 12:30pm without seeing them. It finally went back to normal rhythm at that point and I was discharged a few hours later. Luckily I have health insurance, so I didn’t have to pay much, but I don’t live in bumblefuck; I live in a pretty populated area of New York and was sitting there waiting for treatment for over 15 hours. It’s a dumb argument that we don’t have to wait for treatment as long as countries with socialized healthcare.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s a dumb argument that we don’t have to wait for treatment as long as countries with socialized healthcare.

      Yeah it’s super disingenuous. They like to pretend like we don’t have wait times for specialists too. It’s ridiculous that people still try to use those arguments.

      • blattrules@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Oh that’s another thing; it’s two months to see a cardiologist by me… so they wanted me to follow up with a cardiologist after I got out of the emergency room and it’s a two month wait.

        • marron12@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s weird, I had a-fib recently and the hospital didn’t let me see a cardiologist. I asked several times in the 3 days I was there, and the answer was always no. Until they discharged me, and then it was “you should see a cardiologist ASAP.”

          • blattrules@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            That’s ridiculous. They didn’t shock you out of it? They’re not supposed to let it go more than 48 hours because your blood starts clotting in your heart around that time and can lead to a stroke. I guess they probably gave you blood thinners to prevent that though.

            • marron12@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              No shock, and they did give me a blood thinner after the first night. If I had known what I know now, I might have tried to advocate for myself more, but unfortunately that doesn’t always help.

              • blattrules@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                I think the main risk with it is stroke from the clotting, so the blood thinners alleviate that risk. It’s odd that they didn’t try to shock you out of it tho, I’ve gone to the hospital about five times for it and converted back on my own, but twice they were going to shock me. Usually it’s that threat that scares me back to normal.

    • blujan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      I have never waited for more than a couple hours in public (work-linked) health care or private (own insurance) hospitals in mexico

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 days ago

    Today i crushed my finger in a metal door and it started bleeding a LOT because the metal cut my skin.

    In the beginning i did not want to go to the ER, but then my SO persuaded me “what if you get sepsis and it needs to be amputated???”

    I went there and i waited 1 hour only for triage (i can understand it, everyone was dying on a hospital bed while i had this little cut on the finger)

    after triage the doctor says we need to xray. Xray?? Don’t need it’s just a cut, not broken, i don’t feel painful. She persuades me to wait another hour for the xray and i am a bit pissed because now i have to waste time for xraying a finger that’s definitely not broken, just cut and bleeding.

    Result: i broke my index finger. WHAT?? I did not expect this conclusion.

    Total paid €0, total time 3 hours

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Some fellow Canadians bash our system but usually its those that don’t get what triage is.

    Like my wife felt Ill we went to emerge, maybe waited 4-6 hours. Low blood sugar doctor recommended eating higher protein snacks in between meals.

    But when they figured out I had cancer it was fast track for everything.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      No point in explaining. If you go to the ER in America you’re waiting 12 hours, at least, unless you’re actively dying.

      Oh and it will cost you a nice new car.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      When the Australian Emergency department keeps me waiting for less than 15 minutes, I really start to worry.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah the reason I haven’t waited that long in the ER isn’t because I’m American. Ok actually it is, as an American I’m not going to the ER unless I’m certain I have to. Head trauma, blood loss, issues breathing, anaphalaxis… I think a bone might be broken? I can go to the urgent care in the morning

  • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 days ago

    how do people not understand triage? The longer you wait, the less of an emergency it is.

    If your experience with ER is waiting for longer than an hour, then you went to the Emergency Room without an Emergency.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 days ago

      Though I totally agree that triage is important, you can absolutely be left waiting for more than an hour with an emergency. It’s just not as pressing of an emergency as other people. There’s plenty that an urgent care can’t do for you that requires an ER but that is not life threatening within the next few hours.