What is this guy thinking lmao 🥴🤔

      • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 days ago

        So she’s actually as repugnant as he is, and her views are just as bad. I can’t remember her name and I can’t be bothered to look it up because fuck her, but she’s a minor influencer in the Conservative sphere. She goes on the streets and does those stupid shock value “interviews” with strangers.

        For anyone curious, this is from a series that a Lefty political commentator, Luke Beasley, did, where he and her sat together and tried to have measured discussions about their views. It was interesting, but it only went on for about 6 episodes, and it was rocky the entire way.

        Its all up on YouTube. And I watched. And despite her showing the smallest glimmer of understanding occasionally, she ultimately could not be convinced to change her views. It didnt help that her vile ass husband was behind the camera the entire time.

        Lastly, her husband didnt overtly say the above quote verbatim, but it was definitely heavily implied. This wasn’t putting words in his mouth, its a legit view he has.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      No wonder MAGAs are obsessed with Cucks, their wives are desperate to feel something other than pain.

    • Tomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s mad how far I had to scroll to find that you’re the only person who’s clocked how she’s looking at him

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’d argue that he’s just trying to claim that the reason no woman has ever gotten pleasure from sex with him is because he didn’t want her to.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      you should also notice that’s the conservative worldview in general. people only have a right to exist as long as they’re useful to society in one way or another. the same also appears in the work context, where they’re sternly against “handouts” because they don’t want to give “lazy” people a way to exist.

      • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        people only have a right to exist as long as they’re useful to society in one way or another.

        And the view of the current conservatives in power in the US is that you can only be useful to society in very specific ways: For women, it’s reproduction and home making, and if you dare break out of that you are “destroying society”.

      • Obinice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        people only have a right to exist as long as they’re useful to society in one way or another

        Capitalism, you say? :-D

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        As an econometrician / data wonk, I’m pretty sure we are past ‘plausible’, more like well into ‘you could do a legitimate scientific paper on this and essentially prove it, and now we’re arguing over error bounds and precise methodology’.

    • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah, was gonna say - this guy is another one of the “always, in every context, thinking about gay sex” closeted Republicans. Religion does this to them, the systematic and merciless repression of sexuality causes it to become an immense burden.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Religion does this to them, the systematic and merciless repression of sexuality causes it to become an immense burden.

        Not just for the ones in the closet either. Hetero people are told their entire lives that sex is bad and internalize that their desires are evil, then they get married and you expect them to suddenly have a healthy sexual relationship?

  • hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    12 days ago

    I bet, the next thing he said was “Dominating another guy is alpha male behaviour”.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        If you fail to get him boipreg, then it just means you are not masculine enough, and need to try again. And again. Until you get that butt baby.

      • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I think they just romanticize Western antiquity which often saw sex as a manifestation of power and control rather than an expression of intimate connection.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Also the Roman elites literally only had sex with their wives to procreate. For pleasure they went to the brothel or fuck a slave or concubine.

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 days ago

      Sound bite listening republicans on facebook, twitter, etc. These people exist so there is a big enough ‘ecosystem’ to capture the common person who is swayed by public opinion. That is, where public opinion is the vague sense they have of everyone agreeing with them because it’s all they see between little puppy videos or recipe videos or their weird aunt ranting about democrats being evil.

        • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Look, so do I, but there’s a clear difference in a lot of ways between how folks consume media. I see a relative doing it in a way that’s just… sad. I would put reddit’s way of it, even with all the algorithmic bulldonkey, above facebook or tiktok feeds.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Exactly! Ugh, if these miserable, global extremist, sacks of dog shit hate freedom so much, why won’t they all just go build a man made floating island somewhere in the middle of the ocean and leave the rest of the world alone, instead of dragging us all into a fucking holy war just to force us to be miserable too?

      Answer:

      A. They aren’t actually capable of creating/building anything on their own, and are completely reliant on exploiting others because they’re a bunch of talentless cocksuckers.

      B. They thrive on the attention/theatrics of it all and need a captive audience.

      C. Even if they suddenly woke up to a world where every need was met and everyone was exactly like them, they would be even more miserable nobody was paying attention to them, and still find excuses to go to war with each other.

      D. All of the above (it’s this)

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    11 days ago

    If you’re having sex with a woman, you’re having sex with someone that likes dick. People who like dick are gay. Having sex with a gay person makes you gay.

    Checkmate libtards.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        The only way to stop being gay is to never touch her again, otherwise you’re touching someone who has touched a dick and by the transitive property that makes you gay. Touching your wife is gay.

            • Tomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 days ago

              Ok, thanks for clarifying.

              I’ve got another…

              What about when you’re out shopping and you’re unloading the contents of the trolley onto the conveyor belt at the checkout and you accidentally touch your wife’s box of tampons/panty liners?

              Does that make you gay??

              I guess you’re already gay at that point for unloading the trolley

              • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                11 days ago

                Exactly. You’re in the grocery store for something other than beer? Gay.

                And that ignores the fact that just buying feminine products makes you Uber-Queer.

                • Honytawk@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  I have an other.

                  What if you are in a manly bar drinking manly beer. And you strike up a manly conversation with an other man about lumberjacking or something. And when you talk about sharpening your manly axe, you accidentally touch their hairy hand. Which causes your piercingly manly gazes to lock like the door on a sportscar.

                  So you start talking about WWE and show each other how to perform a death grip with your arms tightly around each other. Then you want to test the strength of their lips, by giving them a manly kiss. And you carry them like a firefighter into a toilet stall to compare your manly leather underwear.

                  And you end up fucking the shit out of each other.

                  Is that gay?

          • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            Yes, and on top of that, pooping is slightly gay. Also, using your hands to pee is gay because you’re touching a dick. Also sitting down to pee is gay. And do NOT wash your penis, unless you’re super gay.

    • SolarMyth@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’m guessing the logic is:

      Gay people only have sex for pleasure (because they can’t reproduce), therefore, all sex for pleasure is gay.

      Its like saying fish only swim in water because they can’t go on land, therefore, all creatures that swim are fish.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        If you interpret gay in the original meaning (“full of joy, merry, light-hearted, carefree”) then yes, having sex with your wife can be gay sex.

    • Spykee@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Dear Aunt Agatha,
      I own a dick.
      I like to have my dick caressed by other dick-loving individual.
      What does that make me?
      Sincerely,
      All-out-now McJohnson

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        You said dick three times in your letter. If you say the word dick that means you’re thinking of a dick, and that makes you gay.

  • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    12 days ago

    It is gay to make your wife’s pussy wet?

    She has to be in pain otherwise you’re a fag that has feelings.

    Insanity.