• SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      And they STILL think this. And before Canadians get all smug, look at how popular Smith and Ford are and how Poilievre got elected by a landslide in AB. The more Doug grifts, the better he does in polls.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        King Charles called and said stfu AB. true story. First Nations were there too and I think they were filling in the eviction notices

        Also AB conservatives won that same riding in the main election too. they are still short the riding pp lost in the first place.

        By the by he’s not regained the lead of the party…yet.

  • meep_launcher@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is it bad that my thought was “well at least that’s more accurate”?

    My mind went to how “the department of defense” was Orwellian AF. I mean his reasoning is fucked don’t get me wrong.

      • bampop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        You can tell he’s never read 1984, he’d definitely want more ironically named government departments if he had

        • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I mean, “Truth Social” has all the irony of the Ministry of Truth, though I assume if it was named for that reason it wasn’t thought up by him.

    • Poojabber@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, in this rare instance, I agree with Uncle Donny. The US hasnt fought a war for peace or defense in over 75 years. Might as well change the name to more accurately depict its purpose. He is still a moron though…

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It was the “War Department” from 1789 to 1947.

      And also the Department of the Navy was its own thing for a while, as was the Department of the Army, then Air Force, before getting folded into the War Department. Harry Truman dissolved the War Department in 1947 because 1) WWII was over and so the US was not in a declared war anymore, and 2) there was a larger consolidation of war powers under the SecDef post-war.

      If anything, name it the Department of Violence and Death and see how people react.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    4 days ago

    “we want offense too”
    The obese imbecile being alive is offensive. The fact that it breathes is offensive.
    And the fact that it’s not strapped to a guillotine that’s got a blunt rusty blade is fucking offensive!

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    He doesn’t understand the negative connotations behind it and why one of the main branches of the empire needs to be obfuscated in euphemism? I kinda believe the mental decline rumours now, lol, or maybe he’s just testing the waters to see if Americans still have that bloodthirst like the good ol’ Bush days, idk.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think he just likes to dangle something controversial and shiny in his left hand so you forget he’s hiding the Epstein files behind his back with the right hand. He def knows how to rustle the left’s jimmies, unfortunately.

      • dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think he is just that simple of a man.

        Defense is not aggressive and therefore bad. War sounds aggressive so it’s good.

        That’s it. That is the whole thought process of this simpleton.

        • BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Honestly, even turning the thought into a sentence, putting letters to the words, is more work than his brain did to get there

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        No, stop treating him like he’s some sort of brilliant conman. He’s never been. Even his own sister has said that he’s a moron - his entire plan consists of “I wanna”. I want it to be the Department of War, I want to be the one launching wars, I want to be the guy pushing the Big Red Button. He’s a narcissist, and narcissists rarely tend to think more than a step or two ahead. They assume everyone’s dumber than them, and they can rarely be dissuaded from this.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I agree he’s far from brilliant, and I really mean his admin more than him alone. There are some real insidious people with his ear

    • PDFuego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      mental decline

      Are you forgetting he remembered “person, woman, man, camera, TV” that one time?

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Not relevant to trump, but: it is ironic that we (the US) haven’t fought a genuinely defensive war since 1812, and we only managed a draw in that one (which included our capital being burned to the ground and our greatest victory coming after it was technically over) because our opponent was busy fighting a bunch of cheese-eating surrender monkeys (and only winning because the fucking Germans helped out).

    Edit: it’s hard to imagine somebody using the expression “cheese-eating surrender monkeys” and being serious about it, but I guess some people can imagine that.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        In the sense of genuinely defending our own country from invasion or destruction? Definitely not. Hawaii wasn’t a state at the time and the Japanese never had plans to invade it anyway.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I assume you mean the French?

      You do know they’re the most successful military in human history right?

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              The term gained political traction in the US, especially in right-wing circles, when Jonah Goldberg, a columnist for the National Review magazine, used it in the title of an April 1999 column on the “Top Ten Reasons to Hate the French”.[11] In the run up to and during the Iraq War, Goldberg reprised it to criticize European nations and France in particular for not joining the Coalition of the Willing, the United States-led invasion and occupation of Iraq.[2]

              You should read what you link, it’s right wing adjacent because right wingers ruin everything fun with a disturbing lack of nuance.

              • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Of course others have taken it to express hatred. But it wasn’t originally meant to be used in that way by the writer, and that’s the point I intended to make. I’m not arguing whether it’s right or wrong, I just noticed that its origin hadn’t been mentioned yet and figured it was worth mentioning.

                • Madison420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Of course others have taken it to express hatred. But it wasn’t originally meant to be used in that way by the writer, and that’s the point I intended to make.

                  The entire point of the joke is that we’re both rude and ignorant and rude out of ignorance.

            • cheloxin@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I dunno why, but I absolutely love it when someone comments “no it isn’t” without a comma and the person comes back with “yes, it is” with comma. Commas do a lot of work in creating tone in text and that example is probably one of the most obvious to notice/cite and one of my favorites. So I guess I have an idea of why after all lmao

              • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Huh, normally I would have omitted that comma myself. I’m not sure why I included it there. I guess it was, as you say, to be even more of a dick to the OP. :)

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 days ago

    someone put him out of his misery. its cruel to force him to live like this. cruel to everyone else in the world at least

    • L7HM77@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Judaic heaven might actually be hell for him. Sparsely populated grassy knolls, have to walk everywhere, nothing to do but watch sheep and talk to people, and a bigger tyrant that would get pissed off if he starts trying to regain a following.

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Defense product >> WAR MACHINE

    Military Contractor >> MERCENARY

    Ambassador >> SPY MASTER