AI and legal experts told the FT this “memorization” ability could have serious ramifications on AI groups’ battle against dozens of copyright lawsuits around the world, as it undermines their core defense that LLMs “learn” from copyrighted works but do not store copies.
Sam Altman would like to remind you each Old Lady at a Library consume 284 cubic feet of Oxygen a day from the air.
Also, hey at least they made sure to probably destroy the physical copy they ripped into their hopelessly fragmented CorpoNapster fever dream, the law is the law.
Exactly. Saw a poster on here the other day defending it, saying its a new way to search. We’re really boiling the planet and hoarding all computer components for years for search?
It’s worse than search because it strips original context and invents new (often incorrect) context around whatever it is copy/pasting.
Yes, well. Have you considered how much money it’s making for about 20 people??
I’d pay more money to not use it.
That’s how we got into this mess. Burn it down.
Yes, agreed. We shouldn’t have to pay extra to have products not be annoying the fuck out of us. On principle, I wouldn’t pay them for it, but I want it all gone so badly–ai assistants, ads for shows and music, all of it. Fuck them for making our experiences shitty for their profit.
Yeah. Then it destroys traditional search engines by overrunning them with slop