Belgae Social
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Sahwa@reddthat.com to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 5 days ago

Meta’s AI facial recognition smart glasses plan ‘will put women at risk’

www.independent.co.uk

external-link
message-square
34
link
fedilink
257
external-link

Meta’s AI facial recognition smart glasses plan ‘will put women at risk’

www.independent.co.uk

Sahwa@reddthat.com to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 5 days ago
message-square
34
link
fedilink
Domestic abuse charities said the feature could pose a ‘direct and serious’ risk to survivors
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    It should be socially acceptable to punch people wearing these in the fucking face.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Only one way to normalize stuff…

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    5 days ago

    Is there any definable social group that they won’t put at risk?

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      5 days ago

      rich, white males

      • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Well, they’re going to be easier to identify with their meta glasses.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          Don’t underestimate the number of people who will intentionally skip meals to save for these, like iPhones, Gucci, LV…

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Maybe.

        I wouldn’t count on it, though.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      People only care about invasions of privacy when it affects women, apparently.

      And for some reason they’ll get really upset when I point that out…

  • Wammityblam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 days ago

    Every single aspect of our lives are being taken over by ethically bankrupt billionaires that will never in a million years face consequences.

    It’s so exhausting that every single day the rich and powerful are infiltrating hobbies like gaming, tech, media, etc, and are actively making them all worse because there is no accountability whatsoever for these rich fucks and the people in positions of power who they bribe

    • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      deleted by creator

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 days ago

    Meta, stalking women since college.

  • mr_anny@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    5 days ago

    Obvious solution is to abandon Meta completely.

  • reboot6675@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I remember when some students did a PoC of this to showcase the dangers of the glasses, and Meta replied like “why are we to blame, it would have worked the same with any camera”. Well, any other camera doesn’t look like a regular pair of glasses motherfucker.

    https://www.404media.co/whats-the-difference-between-ai-glasses-and-an-iphone-a-helpful-guide-for-meta-pr/

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Same guys are buying shoe cameras for upskirt shots on trains.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        jokes on them.

        I got a dick.

    • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      The someone else would have invented the bomb argument! Yeah, but you didn’t have to invent the privacy invasive thing you dingus! Not you you, them you.

      Ugghh I hate this timeline.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        you dingus!

        https://www.wkyc.com/article/news/local/northeast-ohio/village-of-butler-mayor-wesley-dingus-charged-voyeurism-sniffing-teen-girl-underwear/95-767df36b-accb-40c9-b2b8-3b7998b3898a

        • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Not what I was referencing but terrifying thanks!

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Wesley Dingus. Hero of pervs.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Women and girls could be put at risk of harassment, stalking, and abuse if Meta presses ahead with plans to add AI facial recognition features to its smart glasses, leading charities have warned. Experts said the technology, which would allow wearers to identify people and find out information about them using the platform’s AI tool, could pose a “direct and serious” risk to survivors by placing them “in harm’s way” and enabling abusers to locate and track them.

    No! 🫨

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      No whaaaAaa? Noooo!

  • Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    This shit is horrifying for absolutely everyone, another reason im thankful I’ve kept my social media profile to a complete minimum.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    “But trans women with penises!”

    • Renat@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Everyone is at risk. I once saw screenshot from X of image of little girl with dog with comment asking “Grok, make them naked”. I’m so glad I didn’t see the Grok’s reply. I wonder why some popular people are still on X. Meta smart glasses could probably make the same thing if they were jailbreaked. 10 years ago there was only scam ads of these products in newspapers. Now we live in dystopia where it is true.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I wonder why some popular people are still on X

        Because their own need for attention is greater than the concern they may have about enabling chid pornography, the dissemination of conspiracy theories or and/or Nazi propaganda

  • Bazell@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    The times, when it is easier to generate forbidden content than to film/create it, have finally come. Our world is so much cooked that some global disaster would be a God’s mercy, not a punishment.

  • brie_cheese@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    i detest the direction smart wearables are going :(

  • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    First of all, fuck META and fuck spyware.

    That being said, as someone with a neurological disorder that makes it difficult or impossible for me to recognize people, the benefits of a piece of software that could tell me someone name WHEN THEY HAVE ALREADY GIVEN IT TO ME would be so beneficial.

    A lot of people don’t realize how impossible it is to form attachments to people when I have to meet them a dozen times to remember that they exist.

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Open Source already did this years ago, except it wasn’t creepy nor privacy invasive.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        My issue is with facial recognition, maybe I didn’t do enough to clarify. Unless I’m misunderstanding, you have to put information into that but I don’t have that information.

        It’s like a stranger walking up to you on the street and trying to interact with you. Not very comfortable. But then as they speak, you recognize their voice and their body language and you suddenly realize it’s one of your good friends. The issue is that I would like to be able to realize that’s my good friend when everyone else would normally be able to.

  • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m not sure why these glasses get the hate for this. It’ll be available with any camera hooked up to ai search tools.

    • psychOdelic she/her@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Cameras shouldn’t be hooked to ai

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Because they are hooked up to AI search tools probably

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      But this camera is hidden so creeps can follow women.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I gotta put little fake lenses on my glasses do I can ride the fad!..oh it’s done. Boy that was quick! I gotta get all these stickers off my glasses before someone punches me in the face for having to correct my eyesight.

Fuck AI@lemmy.world

fuck_ai@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !fuck_ai@lemmy.world

“We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!”

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as “AI” meant to increase market valuations.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.66K users / day
  • 4.32K users / week
  • 8.07K users / month
  • 14.9K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 6.11K subscribers
  • 2.02K Posts
  • 28K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Proud Cascadian@lemmy.world
  • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
  • BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
  • cynar@lemmy.world
  • drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
  • pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
  • CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
  • WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
  • Communist@lemmy.ml
  • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
  • Tinks@lemmy.world
  • wizblizz@lemmy.world
  • corus_kt@lemmy.world
  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
  • MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
  • 33550336@lemmy.world
  • Nougat@fedia.io
  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
  • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
  • scratsearcher 🔍🔮📊🎲@sopuli.xyz
  • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
  • ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org