• Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, this is understandable but like, where were these people who are up in arms two decades ago? The ship has sailed. Walk around in any store, mall, shopping center, urban area… But no, all those recording devices are to keep me “safe”. But glasses, now that’s too far.

      • Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 months ago

        There’s a huge difference between a somewhat stationary surveillance camera and a hidden personal camera that films 24/7 without an indicator.

  • Leon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    So transformative will it prove to the human brain, the twenty-something-year-old inventors promise, that wearers will soon be not just thinking, but “vibe thinking.”

    End this. Go down to the Titanic, please.

    • Ech@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      6 months ago

      And putting Ray Ban on the “never buy a fucking thing from” list.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re missing the details:

        Regular wayfarer on the left has the small oval (sometimes chrome) accent. AI wayfarer on the right as the round black camera lenses.

        • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re going up close to every person you see with wayfarers to check the corner for a small oval? The details are too small to matter from a distance.That’s what I’m trying to say.

          There will likely be other models or brands where you can’t even rely on the distinction you’re trying to make here.

          It’s looking bleak.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You’re going up close to every person you see with wayfarers to check the corner for a small oval? The details are too small to matter from a distance.That’s what I’m trying to say.

            No. If I’m walking up to someone intending to interact with them, that is close enough to see the lenses. Upon identifying those, I will elect instead to not interact with that person and keep on walking by.

            The details are too small to matter from a distance.That’s what I’m trying to say.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        I won’t even give them the option to take them off. If I see someone wearing them I had intended to interact with, I’ll keep on walking by and ignore the person.

  • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 months ago

    Genuinely, every person who participated in creating this should be taken out to an island and dumped there, to be forgotten about.

    This is vile.

  • PacMan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 months ago

    I remember this Black Mirror episode! Dudes wife was banging someone else and he gets wicked drunk crashes his car and replays the memory over and over again for years. Good Times! 🫠

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This is a very interesting article. We’re walking right into the very dystopia that so many sci-fi authors repeatedly have warned us about. They were warnings, not a playbook.

    What distinguishes a panopticon isn’t merely inescapable surveillance, but the fact that you don’t know when you’re being watched. You simply have to live with the unbearable uncertainty that, at any moment, you could be.

    Whether people realize it or not, we already live in a panopticon. Not only are there camera everywhere - on buildings, businesses, homes, streets, phones, cars, etc - but there are other sensors and mechanisms tracking things like your movement, activity, and heart rate.

    …despite a growing body of research suggesting that relying on AI models leads to critical thinking skills atrophying.

    There was a novel that predicted this decades ago. The main character was so reliant on his AR goggles that when they were stolen in a mugging he was nearly catatonic until his friends got it back.

    This is the world we are heading toward, and I don’t know what we can possibly do at this point to minimize the harm to both our environment and our species. The worst-case dystopia seems more and more inevitable by the day.

    Edit: The novel was Accelerando, by Charles Stross

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I work for a company that has decided that they want to move forward with a device that will emit a frequency that allows them to track individual cell phones which they plan to use to target people with ads.
      This is a hotel that will know where all their guests are at all times and will use it to tell them what to do.

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sliders, the 90s sci-fi TV show had an episode that explored similar themes with VR. Also the 2020 indie adventure game Virtua Verse also has similar VR themes dominating people’s perceptions of reality to the point that some people spend their whole lives in love a robot that looks like a beautiful person when you have your headset on.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          From the Wikipedia page

          a less obvious, though equally important theme is what Forster refers to as “the sin against the body.” This occurs when people’s intellectual refinement and spirituality advance to such a point that they become disconnected from their physical bodies and are unable to adapt to changing environments.

          After reading the synopsis and then hitting that sentence… This Forster mofo understood something deep within us that most people today have no clue about. It’s like we want to disconnect from the world we live in.

          Maybe it’s that our combination of self awareness and intelligence allow us to have an internal dialogue. It makes us feel like our mind a separate entity that’s driving our physical body around, and isolating our minds from the messiness of the natural world lets us exist in our more pure evolved state or whatever.

          I was admittedly way more into the metaverse (ala Snow Crash, not frickin facebook) and VR concepts decades ago. And I’ve had some great experiences in immersive games including VR. But to flip around the line from The Matrix, “the mind cannot live without the body.” We need to engage all of our senses and live in our environment, and not try to pretend like we’re just another computer on the network.

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Well, if you want a real mind-fuck in a 1970s style of sci-fi, track down William Hjortsberg’s Gray Matters.

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    As someone whose taught a fair number of undergrad classes, my nightmare scenario is a student showing up to an exam wearing one of these fucking things. When I tell them to take the damn things off, they then might protest saying they have prescription lenses and that they’re the only way they can take the exam.

    • utopiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Can’t it just be in the requirement of the exam? If they have connected glasses, they have to remove them for the duration of the exam and use them only after leaving the room. If they are spotted with them, they get disqualified instantly?

      Edit: IMHO the accessibility argument would not stand for a written exam as those glasses are often used to transcribe audio. If it’s written there is nothing to transcribe thus is not required. Those glasses are also more expensive than the non connected one so economically speaking if they can afford these glasses, they sure can afford the non connected ones. If they don’t have a pair of non connected glasses they have to plan ahead of the exam which typically happens weeks if not months after the beginning of the semester so it’s on them to plan accordingly.

      TL;DR: forbid them in school ToS.

    • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      My boss, he owns a pair and is trying to convince our chief operations manager to get pairs for the whole department so we can take pictures of our work.

      We already get a bonus on our pay stubs for having our phones available so we all find this dumb.